Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 3088062, member: 44"] Agree it is somewhat case specific, but in this case where "just cause" is defined (IIRC) as a determination of a violation of NCAA or university rules by the NCAA or the university, one wonders what interviewing Akinjo's relatives has to do with that. In this specific case, one would think that once that finding is established (and clearly it has been) then the issue becomes very fact specific [U]i.e[/U]., was notice timely given in an appropriate manner. It appears to have been. So naming a bunch of high profile witnesses who have nothing to add to those issues sure seems like bad faith, or at best obfuscation, and a public statement about how it merely KO's pursuit of his "Constitutional right to defend himself" seems disingenuous. Good discussion. Any insight on the extent of pre-arbitration discovery? Is it purely agreement driven? If KO's representation really wanted broad discovery, they should have filed suit. [/QUOTE]