Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 3993344, member: 181"] Actually, once you shifted away from the substantive subject to your lesser argument, he offered a stronger response. You (or someone else) had already noted that he rarely shifts of his topical position. Heck, you could even have noted that he brought up the "million times" exaggeration, if you wanted to switch to a non-content criticism. Yours was like an unforced error. Again, it's more an observation than a passion for me to bring up that you constructed a speculation and then offered a follow-up based on the constructed speculation. In terms of building upon a strong foundation, there just ain't no there there. Some people like the asymetrical white samoyed-looking dog more than the blue symmetrical more wolfish-looking husky, and vice versa. And I note that your avatar holds proportions akin to the latter, so I'm thinking that it can't be fully objectionable to you. [/QUOTE]