Louisville will be knocked down soon enough...Rolling my eyes at Louisville moving ahead of Duke. Duke's beaten Kentucky, who beat Louisville. Louisville's only win against a currently ranked team is over LSU in November. In addition to the win over Kentucky, Duke has wins over currently ranked Cal and Purdue. And, unlike Louisville, Duke's only losses have come to the two teams who are clearly a step ahead of everyone else in the country.
Well, yeah. But that's not how it should be.Yeah, in the absolute I think Louisville is maybe a bit too high, and Duke was over-penalized.
But polls are all about "what have you done for me lately" combined with perception.
Yeah, in the absolute I think Louisville is maybe a bit too high, and Duke was over-penalized.
But polls are all about "what have you done for me lately" combined with perception.
Yes and no. Most ratings systems are based on a full year's body of work, and if you had an early season loss to a bad team, that counts as much as if it happened yesterday. But rankings polls weight the recent games much more than November games because they are supposed to reflect the current strength of a team. After winning 10 of their last 14 games going into the NCAA tourney last year in a tough Big East, Louisville might have been better than the #17 ranking they were given in the Coaches poll, though they had a poor early season loss to Colorado. At the end of the season they were a better team than their final 29-9 indicated and got the #3 ranking ahead of Baylor, Duke, Stanford and many teams with fewer losses.Well, yeah. But that's not how it should be.
I agree that more recent games should be waited more heavily. That's not what's happening here with Louisville and Duke. Since the start of the new year, they have a 1-0 record against RPI top 50 teams with a win over Rutgers and haven't had a win against a currently ranked team since they beat LSU on November 14th.Yes and no. Most ratings systems are based on a full year's body of work, and if you had an early season loss to a bad team, that counts as much as if it happened yesterday. But rankings polls weight the recent games much more than November games because they are supposed to reflect the current strength of a team. After winning 10 of their last 14 games going into the NCAA tourney last year in a tough Big East, Louisville might have been better than the #17 ranking they were given in the Coaches poll, though they had a poor early season loss to Colorado. At the end of the season they were a better team than their final 29-9 indicated and got the #3 ranking ahead of Baylor, Duke, Stanford and many teams with fewer losses.
I'm not arguing - one way or the other - which team is better. Only that, objectively based on the records and such that the pollsters use to rank teams, Duke should not have been penalized much for losing to the only 2 teams ahead of them. They are supposed to lose those games. And I certainly won't hold the UConn margin against them - who is not getting blown out by UConn.Over penalized? They were destroyed on their home court by 2 teams. They should be lucky WCBB lacks the type of depth that only Louisville was even available to jump him.
If Duke is so much better than Louisville they will have the opportunity to prove it. If they both lose 3 times to ND and UConn, Duke will have more opportunities to prove their alleged superiority against UNC, Maryland, NC State, etc. Duke has had a number of near miss losses against teams like Miami. Virginia Tech, and FSU. I've seen no evidence that it's some type of outrage that Louisville moved a spot ahead of Duke.