- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,979
- Reaction Score
- 4,307
The AAC is a great conference but nobody cares
The contract should be reduced by at least $83,333,333.33 over the life of the deal, contingent upon adding another member.I didn't realize how much the schools would need to provide in terms of setup for all of the ESPN+ content. The studio, the commentators who are neutral, etc? This wouldn't be as easy as bringing in the SNY crew, they'd need to be neutral. Plus it's need to look professional. No way it costs 300k a year. That part alone is a wasted cost. Now imagine needing a separate crew for men's and women's bball.
I agree with others that the numbers might go down a little. However, it won't be much or enough to really make any impact. The AAC is cheap ESPN+ content. Why lower the price too much and risk pushing them away?
However, we made the right move for multiple reasons. If SNY steps up and takes on our football games, we're in great shape
Wouldn't it be normal somewhere in the negotiation for AAC officials to have gotten a team by team, program by program breakdown of what ESPN was paying the AAC?
This is way outside my specialty but having had to bid a few proposals and viewed some contracts with multiple it would seem odd for the AAC office to just get a check from ESPN without knowing how the individuals teams added up to the final total.
Only 300k to produce for +? That seems really low.
ESPN may have determined what they would pay based on value of different schools and/or programs, but this was not a "pick and choose" where they said what they would pay for each school and the AAC could take or leave each one. They provided the AAC with a number.
I think there seems to be blame to the AAC that isn't warranted here. Without question UConn's programs were probably worth more to ESPN than, say, Tulsa's. But the schools were always splitting the conference TV monies equally, like most other conferences. So yes, UConn may have been paid less than the fair market value of its games, but so is Ohio State and Michigan and Florida and UCLA. Guess what. When we move to the Big EAst, our women's basketball program is going to be worth more to ESPN than everyone else's in our conference combined, and we're still only going to get our pro rata share of the value of it.
Fox.
The fact that the rest of the AAC never never admitted makes it easy to root against them all. Except Cincy.UConn’s name recognition supported the American through its early years.
Commisioner Aresco is that you?The AAC is a great conference but nobody cares
If those teams they feel don't bring value no need. Since we bring value hello renegotiation!!!Hard to figure ESPN...when the Big 12 lost Nebraska, TAMU, Colorado, and Missouri....the mothership didn't lower the contract amount.
The individual payout to Big 12 schools went up by going to 10 teams from 12.
Always wondered why they did not activate the standard language in all of their contracts that allows for renegotiating if a conference loses a member/s.
If those teams they feel don't bring value no need. Since we bring value hello renegotiation!!!
Texas and Oklahoma are the draw and why they didn’t care about the others leaving. ESPN has a channel devoted to Texas.Hard to figure ESPN...when the Big 12 lost Nebraska, TAMU, Colorado, and Missouri....the mothership didn't lower the contract amount.
The individual payout to Big 12 schools went up by going to 10 teams from 12.
Always wondered why they did not activate the standard language in all of their contracts that allows for renegotiating if a conference loses a member/s.
I agree except for that first part.The AAC is a great conference but nobody cares