- Joined
- Jun 30, 2025
- Messages
- 642
- Reaction Score
- 2,923
UConn starting off at #8
Over 50% of our league is 100+ - that is grosser than gross. That's more than half our league being Quad 3 type opportunities.5 teams below Xavier... Gross.
Absolutely dreadful performance by the conference.As of today:
1. UConn (8)
2. Butler (21)
3. St. John's (23)
4. Seton Hall (50)
5. Villanova (64)
6. Xavier (102)
7. Creighton (119)
8. Georgetown (122)
9. Providence (127)
10. Marquette (167)
11. DePaul (183)
Its still semi early, but with conference play starting the middle of this month, time is running out.
Butler is in a good spot, and has an OOC opportunity with Northwestern on the 20th of this month.
Seton Hall has Kansas State/Rutgers left for OOC.
Villanova has Michigan/Pittsburgh/Wisconsin left OOC, as well as either Penn or St. Joe's as part of the Big 5 Classic this weekend. They can really improve their profile.
As for our OOC:
BYU (13)
Arizona (6)
Illinois (24)
Kansas (17)
Florida (33)
Texas (68)
With games against Kansas, Florida and Texas to help.Too early for me to care much, but one thing caught my eye. Strength of schedule in the top 10:
Michigan - 17
Duke - 158
Purdue - 71
Vanderbilt - 117
Gonzaga - 63
Arizona - 85
Iowa St - 220
UConn - 27
Louisville - 288
Michigan St - 96
Out of the top 10, UConn has faced the second hardest schedule and is still 6-1 without a fully healthy and integrated roster. Bodes well
will get Matt Patricia as a HC
Matt Patricia? Why?Over 50% of our league is 100+ - that is grosser than gross. That's more than half our league being Quad 3 type opportunities.
Brett, we just went 9-3 in FB, will get Matt Patricia as a HC and own TD, MSG, Hartford & Storrs. We are willing to make deal you can't refuse.![]()
Probably only 4 on the road, gonna be tough for Xavier or Creighton to get above 75Not many Q1 opportunities in the BE this year.
Looks like 2 (maybe 3) at home if either SH or Nova gets to top 30 & only 5 on the road....ugly. You would think Creighton & Marquette maybe figure it out in BE play and improve.
I really wonder if we end up being the "Golden ticket" for the BE fringe bubble teams, where a W against us is the centerpiece of an otherwise unflattering tourney resume. I will honestly be disappointed if we don't go at least 18-2 in the BE this year (for a team that has title aspirations).Absolutely dreadful performance by the conference.
Once conference play starts, you can only shuffle teams up and down, you're not going to be able to lift all boats. The inverse of this is how the SEC got a ton of bids last year.
This is a 3 bid league unless Seton Hall or Nova rise at the expense of everyone else below them, and assuming Butler doesn't fall off a cliff which is entirely possible.
Texas is 68, so at home, that is Q2. We need these two wins against KU & UF.With games against Kansas, Florida and Texas to help.
I am expecting us to be the SuperBowl for a lot of BE teams on the road this year, that is for sure. Hopefully we are tough enough to muscle those out.I really wonder if we end up being the "Golden ticket" for the BE fringe bubble teams, where a W against us is the centerpiece of an otherwise unflattering tourney resume. I will honestly be disappointed if we don't go at least 18-2 in the BE this year (for a team that has title aspirations).
They have played a very competitive schedule with close losses.I am expecting us to be the SuperBowl for a lot of BE teams on the road this year, that is for sure. Hopefully we are tough enough to muscle those out.
I'm not fully understanding of how the NET works, but how is StJ's in the top 25 with their only meaningful win against 67 Baylor?
Gotta play the games before they count!I am expecting us to be the SuperBowl for a lot of BE teams on the road this year, that is for sure. Hopefully we are tough enough to muscle those out.
I'm not fully understanding of how the NET works, but how is StJ's in the top 25 with their only meaningful win against 67 Baylor?
Weird that close losses are viewed as a value.They have played a very competitive schedule with close losses.
I think it’d be weird not to consider the value of a close loss. Just intuitively, we as a UConn fan base would have been far more pessimistic if we lost to Arizona by 25 than we were losing a close game. The optimists among us saw that despite being down two top 5 players, we hung we with one of the best teams in the country. That’s evidence UConn is a very good team, despite it being a loss.Weird that close losses are viewed as a value.
Strange statement.Weird that close losses are viewed as a value.
What? If you're competitive with good teams it's a sign you might be good. Plenty of close finishes are coin flips anywayWeird that close losses are viewed as a value.
Now we know why we schedule good non-league games. The NOOB will be a slog through awfulness…well, at least we’ll get a chance to play our bench a lot.Not many Q1 opportunities in the BE this year.
Looks like 2 (maybe 3) at home if either SH or Nova gets to top 30 & only 5 on the road....ugly. You would think Creighton & Marquette maybe figure it out in BE play and improve.
It can also be a sign that you are not good. Plenty of bad teams can keep games close. If they used this in the NFL the Giants would have locked up a playoff spot by now!What? If you're competitive with good teams it's a sign you might be good. Plenty of close finishes are coin flips anyway
StJ had one close loss on a neutral court against Iowa St. They have one win over a 67 Baylor. That doesn't seem like a top 25 resume to me.What? If you're competitive with good teams it's a sign you might be good. Plenty of close finishes are coin flips anyway
1 point loss on a neutral court to #7 Iowa St, and a 7 point loss to #14 Alabama.StJ had one close loss on a neutral court against Iowa St. They have one win over a 67 Baylor. That doesn't seem like a top 25 resume to me.