NET Ranking for Tournament Selection | Page 3 | The Boneyard

NET Ranking for Tournament Selection

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
20,039
Reaction Score
40,271
Up to 63 in the latest rankings

If NET were the only criteria (beyond auto-qualifiers), it would appear a team would need to get to at least #48 to get on the bubble, then wait to see how the one-bid leagues shake out.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,393
Reaction Score
89,641
If NET were the only criteria (beyond auto-qualifiers), it would appear a team would need to get to at least #48 to get on the bubble, then wait to see how the one-bid leagues shake out.
Last year the last 4 in were Belmont (47), Temple (56), Arizona St (63), St John's (73)
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
20,039
Reaction Score
40,271
Last year the last 4 in were Belmont (47), Temple (56), Arizona St (63), St John's (73)

Which would tell me that NET wasn't the only criteria. Which makes the "murkiness of selection process" arguments very valid.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,393
Reaction Score
89,641
Which would tell me that NET wasn't the only criteria. Which makes the "murkiness of selection process" arguments very valid.
Correct, it's not and has never claimed to be the only criteria. It just replaced RPI as the primary tool
 

pepband99

Resident TV nerd
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,718
Reaction Score
9,513
hey @nelsonmuntz - the NET got changed today - it's bad for the black box piece, probably good for running up the score concerns...

i really wish they would just publish the damn algorithm - why even hint at something nefarious?

 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,194
Reaction Score
33,053
hey @nelsonmuntz - the NET got changed today - it's bad for the black box piece, probably good for running up the score concerns...

i really wish they would just publish the damn algorithm - why even hint at something nefarious?


I was fine with the RPI.

The selection criteria should reward positive performance by the teams, and the teams should know what the basis is for that assessment. If there is a black box, then how does anyone know how to maximize their teams' performance?
 

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
1,618
Total visitors
1,678

Forum statistics

Threads
157,196
Messages
4,087,618
Members
9,983
Latest member
dogsdogsdog


Top Bottom