Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="zls44, post: 3943499, member: 32"] UMass has FULL institutional buy-in for men's hockey. Its the opposite of what they have for football. UConn had an AD who was all-in on hockey, made the move, and he was replaced by a guy who has no hockey background. Which is fine! And he's a good AD! But hockey is a blind spot. What is UConn hockey? Is it just us complaining about the arena situation and getting Russian kids because getting top US recruits is "too hard"? I'd identify "complaining about our own bad fortune" as our MO more than anything. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.collegehockeyinsider.com/p/umass-is-just-starting-to-climb-the[/URL] [/QUOTE]