Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 3703281, member: 7492"] This quote isn’t necessarily directed at this post on the subject but the aggregation of posts similar: as noted by a few of our very esteemed colleagues and even Geno himself, the departed school can give support for the waiver, not give support or say nothing about the player (neither for or against) and in Shepard case, Nebraska supported her while in the Evina case, Tennessee did NOT give support. Whether they outright said “no” or just was quiet, they were not “upstanding in their character”. From Geno’s diatribe was Clueless Phil complained about an incoming football transfer who was not granted immediate eligibility at the same time so the major hypocrisy by Phil and the UT Administration was abundantly apparent and further reason I (and many of us) continue to loathe the school. The NCAA should have over ruled Tennessee due to the toxic situation but then again, TN is a P5 football school so the Committee may have wanted to appease them. Now that I had to try to qualify the committees decisions, I am off to shower and get this “stink” off of me as defending or explaining anything the committee does is disgusting. [/QUOTE]