Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CocoHusky, post: 2496451, member: 5823"] For me cutting a corner is doing something prohibited by the rules and to the best of my knowledge that is neither ND nor UCONN. We don't have to be "[B]hypothetical" [/B]about what Geno would do in a simmilar situation because he tells us exactly what he did. In the case of Batouly and Azura he "looked" into thier immediate eligibility and decided it had no merits and decided not to pursue. "[I]I don't have an answer behind those other programs what happened, why some kids are eligible and some kids are not," Auriemma said. "I just know that our two are not. From talking to them, it doesn't seem like there is anything that would make me think 'OK we should go and pursue this.' I don't know happened that those other players were able to do that. If I felt there were something there, I would pursue it but it would be dishonest for me to think there is when there isn't."' [URL='https://elmcitytoeaglevillenhr.blogspot.com/2016/10/no-immediate-eligibility-for-uconns.html']The New Haven Register Blogs: Elm City to Eagleville: No immediate eligibility for UConn's transfers[/URL][/I] ND looked into Shepard's situation decided that it had merits and pursued the waiver so I'm afraid I don't see a gray area. [/QUOTE]