Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CL82, post: 2359538, member: 44"]
Not so much actually.  The NCAA has the ability to regulate eligibility for student athletes.  One of the criteria they use to determine eligibility is APR.  UNC entered into a two decade scheme to supplied false information to the NCAA.  They played ineligible athletes.  The penalty for playing an ineligible athlete is forfeiture of the the game.  The NCAA is well within it's ability to have UNC forfeit every game for the last 20 years.

UNC has a duty monitor its sport programs.  It did not, and frankly that's being gracious.  Failure to monitor for 20 years?  The NCAA could levy a post season ban.  Again well within it's wheelhouse.

Now a separate point is that university's providing no show classes are grounds for them to lose accreditation.  The NCAA doesn't decide that issue.  Another point is that the university breached it's contract with students, in that it provided no show classes to some students devaluing it's degree.  The NCAA doesn't decide that issue either.  But just because some parts of UNC's fraud is beyond the reach of the NCAA does not mean that all of it is.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach