- Joined
- Mar 29, 2017
- Messages
- 1,123
- Reaction Score
- 3,570
If the Cs do that it would be . . .I mean, LeBron could post Smart all day if it's a permanent matchup.
Not Smart.
If the Cs do that it would be . . .I mean, LeBron could post Smart all day if it's a permanent matchup.
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.Celts plans on . . .
I mean maybe Philly just wasn’t that great and got a good draw in round 1 with a Miami team who did not at all “deserve” to be in the postseasonNot sure if it's been posted, but this is a great article from Zach Lowe about why and how the Celtics have been so effective these playoffs. Great breakdown.
Lowe: Brad Stevens and the Celtics have a special brand of toughness
I mean maybe Philly just wasn’t that great and got a good draw in round 1 with a Miami team who did not at all “deserve” to be in the postseason
You choke away multiple games to rookies, role players, and old guys like they did... of course they have an outlook most teams would kill for but did Boston really do anything that miraculous? I’m sorry but the last thing I think of when I see Stevens and his sideline demeanor is “that guy really instills toughness in his team”
Maybe we are just using different meaning of “tough”. I’m thinking JC tough. Toughness that was intimidating to the opposition. I distinguish toughness from perseverance, although they are doubly associated. And again, while you can’t not give the Celtics credit for making th necessary plays, the main point of my post was that maybe Philly wasn’t as good in the first place as their Miami series may lead one to believeThe C's lose one of their two big guns for the season five minutes into their first game, lose their remaining big gun and one of their dependable reserves for the season in the Spring, they are starting one second-year player and a rookie whose combined ages don't add up to 40, they are playing the Eastern Conference Finals with somewhat of a chance (probably not a large one) to win the series, I'd take that in part to reflect on the ability of their coach to make them tough and remain focused on winning in spite of adversity.
Congratulations, we are all fairly certain of suchI'm reasonably certain that a large majority of the teams in the NBA would like to be where the C's are today and would hire their coach in a NY minute.
Maybe we are just using different meaning of “tough”. I’m thinking JC tough. Toughness that was intimidating to the opposition. I distinguish toughness from perseverance, although they are doubly associated. And again, while you can’t not give the Celtics credit for making th necessary plays, the main point of my post was that maybe Philly wasn’t as good in the first place as their Miami series may lead one to believe
Congratulations, we are all fairly certain of such
I’m sorry but the last thing I think of when I see Stevens and his sideline demeanor is “that guy really instills toughness in his team”
I mean maybe Philly just wasn’t that great and got a good draw in round 1 with a Miami team who did not at all “deserve” to be in the postseason
You choke away multiple games to rookies, role players, and old guys like they did... of course they have an outlook most teams would kill for but did Boston really do anything that miraculous? I’m sorry but the last thing I think of when I see Stevens and his sideline demeanor is “that guy really instills toughness in his team”
Take the best two players off any NBA team and make a case for how they make the conference finals. Houston, Cleveland, Toronto, Bucks, Blazers, Spurs (lost 1) all would have no shot. Maybe Warriors and it’d be celebrated as extraordinary just like the Celtics are.I mean maybe Philly just wasn’t that great and got a good draw in round 1 with a Miami team who did not at all “deserve” to be in the postseason
You choke away multiple games to rookies, role players, and old guys like they did... of course they have an outlook most teams would kill for but did Boston really do anything that miraculous? I’m sorry but the last thing I think of when I see Stevens and his sideline demeanor is “that guy really instills toughness in his team”
From that Stevens article, "All things (almost) equal, Ainge is going to take the guy who needs to get loose balls." That means there was no chance he would ever select a UConn player over the last few years.
I don't know if Stevens instills toughness so much as he channels it. The toughness itself is a credit to the players. Ainge specifically seeks those guys out during the draft evaluation process. If he has reservations about the competitiveness of a player, he'll back off. Identifying players with the right temperament is probably a bigger part of the job than managing it. Rozier, Tatum, Horford, Smart, and Brown came out of the womb with an edge. That's not Stevens.
But "fire" and "toughness" and "competitiveness" can turn to selfishness or anxiety real quick, and to the extent that Stevens has been able to nurture those attributes into a winning formula is a credit to him.
I mean maybe Philly just wasn’t that great and got a good draw in round 1 with a Miami team who did not at all “deserve” to be in the postseason
You choke away multiple games to rookies, role players, and old guys like they did... of course they have an outlook most teams would kill for but did Boston really do anything that miraculous? I’m sorry but the last thing I think of when I see Stevens and his sideline demeanor is “that guy really instills toughness in his team”
Maybe we are just using different meaning of “tough”. I’m thinking JC tough. Toughness that was intimidating to the opposition. I distinguish toughness from perseverance, although they are doubly associated. And again, while you can’t not give the Celtics credit for making th necessary plays, the main point of my post was that maybe Philly wasn’t as good in the first place as their Miami series may lead one to believe
Any Rockets fans here? Do they have any chance of beating the GSWs?
Looking back 2 years ago, the GS loss to Cleveland after being up 3-1 is probably the biggest choke job in the history of the NBA.
What about this year? They have 2 HOF locks (SC and KD), a probable HOF player (KT), a possible HOF player (Green). The two locks include the best shooter ever and possibly the best offensive player ever. They also have a very high level set of supporting players. If they don't win this year, barring injury, it would be a massive choke job.
I would say that Houston has around a 40% chance to beat them. GS has proven to be capable of turning the ball over and that could cost them. And as pointed out, they have choked it away once, so it's always possible it could happen again. Having said that, I think Houston has to win the first game to have any shot at it, and I still just have trouble imagining anyone beating the Warriors 4 times in a series.Any Rockets fans here? Do they have any chance of beating the GSWs?
Looking back 2 years ago, the GS loss to Cleveland after being up 3-1 is probably the biggest choke job in the history of the NBA.
What about this year? They have 2 HOF locks (SC and KD), a probable HOF player (KT), a possible HOF player (Green). The two locks include the best shooter ever and possibly the best offensive player ever. They also have a very high level set of supporting players. If they don't win this year, barring injury, it would be a massive choke job.
GS turns the ball over too much, and they had the same issue they had two years ago (Steph Curry playing at less than 100%). But still, I think they're 80-20 to win. Durant being there, and being the best player on the floor, covers up most of this. And when they play the Cavs they'll have a close 2nd best player, in addition to Curry-Thompson-Green before we can get into a debate about borderline HOFers Iggy/Love.Any Rockets fans here? Do they have any chance of beating the GSWs?
Looking back 2 years ago, the GS loss to Cleveland after being up 3-1 is probably the biggest choke job in the history of the NBA.
What about this year? They have 2 HOF locks (SC and KD), a probable HOF player (KT), a possible HOF player (Green). The two locks include the best shooter ever and possibly the best offensive player ever. They also have a very high level set of supporting players. If they don't win this year, barring injury, it would be a massive choke job.
GS turns the ball over too much, and they had the same issue they had two years ago (Steph Curry playing at less than 100%). But still, I think they're 80-20 to win. Durant being there, and being the best player on the floor, covers up most of this. And when they play the Cavs they'll have a close 2nd best player, in addition to Curry-Thompson-Green before we can get into a debate about borderline HOFers Iggy/Love.
I don't think Tatum or Horford really fit that mold coming in. The celtics staff certainly molded tatum, and have turned horf into one of the toughest bigs in the league, imo.
Why do you say that? Not sure many within the organization would agree with that characterization of Horford.
Not buying that - it's a cover and complete Horse S---t. Dude just choked, which is what the team did. They were up 3-1. In game 4, Curry played 40 minutes and had 38 points in a win, shooting .538 from 3. Those aren't "injured player" numbers. Curry and the Ws choked away a 3-1 lead. They had an "historic" season and they followed it up with an "historic" choke job. Everything else is noise.Yeah curry was hurt the whole series,
I would say that Houston has around a 40% chance to beat them. GS has proven to be capable of turning the ball over and that could cost them. And as pointed out, they have choked it away once, so it's always possible it could happen again. Having said that, I think Houston has to win the first game to have any shot at it, and I still just have trouble imagining anyone beating the Warriors 4 times in a series.
No doubt. The choke job in 2016 was the worst choke in NBA history.They choked it away sans KD. It's a whole other monster now.
Lol, who is the 5th HOF player on the Warriors roster?No doubt. The choke job in 2016 was the worst choke in NBA history.
If they don't win this year with potentially 5 HOF players on their roster, including the greatest shooter and greatest offensive player ever, it may end up being the worst choke in the history of sports.
Yeah, but they were playing against the greatest coach and QB in the history of the league, they weren't heavy favorites, and so on. 3-1 choke by GS is a much bigger choke, especially considering Game 7 was at home.The Falcons blew a 25 point 3rd quarter lead in the Super Bowl so there is that.