Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NBA Discussion 2016/2017
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="champs99and04, post: 2056481, member: 488"] Wonder if there is anything to the Otto Porter/LAC rumors. He's the type of player that could take that team to the next level, but I can't imagine why Washington would want to make him available. 50+ games in, things are starting to get very interesting. The title race still seems like a formality, but there are some story lines that intrigue me as a casual NBA fan. One, the East is wide open - you look at Detroit in the eight spot and you wonder if they could beat a team like Boston in the first round. When you're #2 seed has a +2.8 point differential (and Cleveland is only +5.4), that means it's a really weak conference. I don't exempt Cleveland from this, either. I think they're more vulnerable than people think, and while I wouldn't pick Toronto to beat them, but you could have a series there. Washington looks dangerous and even Atlanta is intriguing. I'm fascinated by the Cousins trade. Cousins would have fit much better in Boston, IMO. He can work with Davis just because they're both amazing players, but it isn't optimal. Seems like they're building a team to win the 1974 title. You'd much rather pair Davis with a perimeter guy and play him as a pick and pop killer. Somebody like Paul George would have fit much better, IMO. They'll probably be just good enough to win one game against Golden State in the playoffs, but who knows how these things play out. San Antonio lurks, as always. I think Patty Mills needs more minutes, but their front court is built - unlike New Orleans - to dictate the tenor of the game on both ends. The Clippers still carry the cache of a contender to me, even if everything points against that - they've rarely been whole over the last two years, and the last time they were, they were a Falcons-like choke job from the conference finals (same sort of thing happened against OKC the previous year). Houston feels gimmicky to me but they'll still be fun to watch, and this Jazz team should be fun to check out when I get around to realizing they exist. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,575
Messages
4,401,876
Members
10,216
Latest member
illini2013
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NBA Discussion 2016/2017
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom