Did someone who has ever beaten the triple option say that?I heard once that eye discipline was really important when stopping the triple option.
Did someone who has ever beaten the triple option say that?
There was no line on the Maine game. So it's hard to use it as a betting gauge for Navy.
This was actually my thought as well.
This quote from Diaco would seem to echo the OP's thoughts as well as my own.
Mike Anthony @ManthonyCourant 5h5 hours ago
Diaco on preparing for triple option in one week: "Impossible." Part of preseason camp devoted to it, though.
Agreed. Since Diaco has gotten here he has maintained pretty much the same thought and regards to game planning for the triple option. When it is so different from 90% of the main stream schemes you will play in a season, it takes a lot to prepare for it.I was thinking this was one reason BC was able to slow down GT. They had fall camp to prepare. Much tougher task later in the season with only one week.
Covers.com has it down to 3.5 with 72% of the public betting Navy. Maybe Whaler or someone can help me out here - if the line opens at 7.5 and the vast majority of the public are on the favorite, why is the line trending down?
Covers.com has it down to 3.5 with 72% of the public betting Navy. Maybe Whaler or someone can help me out here - if the line opens at 7.5 and the vast majority of the public are on the favorite, why is the line trending down?
Cannot believe people still think this is how it works. This is just plain wrong.The line is set to get even action on both sides. If 72% are on Navy, the line will rise. A 4 point drop in the spread would be enormous had it been done just as a response to the action. I believe it was dropped because it was originally set before the QB was officially ruled out.