I think its a moot point now. Lou it is.Not that it will have any effect on outcome of the Temple game, but I'm getting vibes that Lou will soon be in the starting lineup in place of Napheesa.
Starter or starter's minutes ? Or both ?
What say you ?
Let assume Gabby starts. Then we have:I agree with those who have said it may not matter much whether Lou starts or Napheesa starts. I love what I've seen so far from each of them, for different reasons, and it's exciting to think that they're only going to get better. Besides, there have been seasons when some of Geno's starters saw fewer minutes than some of the bench players.
That said, I wasn't terribly surprised to see Lou start the second half against Memphis or tonight's game against Temple. I think our offense has gone to a completely different level since she started finding her shot again over the past couple games, and not only because of her obvious ability to light up the scoreboard when she's hot. When she's out there, it becomes that much harder for an opposing defense to pack the lane against us, and (as Geno said after tonight's game) an extended defense leads to better offensive flow and gives Stewie a lot more room to move around and dominate. It remains to be seen how the rest of the season will play out (hopefully the dreaded "freshman wall" doesn't appear!), but it's hard to believe the starting job won't be hers for the foreseeable future.
It's hard to see how you keep Lou on the bench. WCBB be warned, Lou has discovered that the baskets in college work just like those in high school.Let assume Gabby starts. Then we have:
KLS, Napheesa, Butler. Chong and Ekmark as benches.
This is a very very deep bench ....
LOU: to start+finishNot that it will have any effect on outcome of the Temple game, but I'm getting vibes that Lou will soon be in the starting lineup in place of Napheesa.
Starter or starter's minutes ? Or both ?
What say you ?
And she did!!I want to see Lou channeling her inner Kaleena.
If the game is close in the last 5 minutes, we all know that Geno will put in his 5 best crunch time players. It could be Gabby cause she can play great D, get steals, rebound, and score inside--with energy. Collier is a good defender, shot blocker & rebounder with a little less scoring. Lou plays decent D these days, but there are 3 things that she has that Geno would want in a close game. First, a 3 pt. shot. Next, great passing. (I think Geno realizes that Lou could be the passer that Dolson was). Third, less turnovers and less personal fouls. Geno has said many times this year that there will be games where UConn has to outscore the other team. That's Lou in spades!
Did you know that both Collier and Gabby have more turnovers than assists? Lou was at 33 assists with 15 turnovers. Also, Collier & Gabby have almost 30 personal fouls each and Lou has 15.
Final point - talking about starting vs finishing, etc. As with the Temple game, starting is important for Geno now because there are only 16 games left (give or take) before the NCAA tourney. The starters get to play almost, if not all of the first half and part of the 3rd quarter---to get that winning flow and chemistry. They had it again tonight. Yes, Lou is probably the piece to Geno's puzzle. These next 16 games will be fine-tuning the starting 5. This is the third game in a row where the timing and flow were obvious. With Lou in, all 5 starters can hit the three (Gabby & Collier can't.) Lou is the best passer of the three and IMHO, as good as any of the other starters (especially with her height to look over the floor.) IMO Lou will start most if not every game to keep the starting 5 sharp! Gabby comes in first, then Collier and Chong (if she is healthy.) Big games--UConn goes back down to 6 or 7 players.
The fun part is watching it all unfold.
Not that it will have any effect on outcome of the Temple game, but I'm getting vibes that Lou will soon be in the starting lineup in place of Napheesa.
Starter or starter's minutes ? Or both ?
What say you ?
Didn't know the numbers, but yes if Gabby could keep up her defense with less fouling she would get more minutes; you don't want fouls especially late in the game.If the game is close in the last 5 minutes, we all know that Geno will put in his 5 best crunch time players. It could be Gabby cause she can play great D, get steals, rebound, and score inside--with energy. Collier is a good defender, shot blocker & rebounder with a little less scoring. Lou plays decent D these days, but there are 3 things that she has that Geno would want in a close game. First, a 3 pt. shot. Next, great passing. (I think Geno realizes that Lou could be the passer that Dolson was). Third, less turnovers and less personal fouls. Geno has said many times this year that there will be games where UConn has to outscore the other team. That's Lou in spades!
Did you know that both Collier and Gabby have more turnovers than assists? Lou was at 33 assists with 15 turnovers. Also, Collier & Gabby have almost 30 personal fouls each and Lou has 15.
Final point - talking about starting vs finishing, etc. As with the Temple game, starting is important for Geno now because there are only 16 games left (give or take) before the NCAA tourney. The starters get to play almost, if not all of the first half and part of the 3rd quarter---to get that winning flow and chemistry. They had it again tonight. Yes, Lou is probably the piece to Geno's puzzle. These next 16 games will be fine-tuning the starting 5. This is the third game in a row where the timing and flow were obvious. With Lou in, all 5 starters can hit the three (Gabby & Collier can't.) Lou is the best passer of the three and IMHO, as good as any of the other starters (especially with her height to look over the floor.) IMO Lou will start most if not every game to keep the starting 5 sharp! Gabby comes in first, then Collier and Chong (if she is healthy.) Big games--UConn goes back down to 6 or 7 players.
The fun part is watching it all unfold.
Nice post Coach!
One thing I will say is that Lou wasn't recruited to replace anyone - she was recruited because she was an incredibly talented basketball player with personal traits that Uconn prizes. She arrived the year after KML graduated and her distance shooting is certainly something that is welcome having lost KML's skills in that area, but they are very different players with very different body types and a different mixture of strengths.
I found Geno's comparison to Sveta interesting, and of the recent Uconn players I think she is more similar in skills to Stewart than KML and to some degree is following Stewarts development path as a freshman.
Sveta was the first player at Uconn on whom I had a 'crush'! (Still do, dirty old man that I am! ) So it is a pleasure to revisit her time at Uconn.Hey Uc - I like how this board, at times, is the opposite of an onion. Posters build on and add layers of insight. I agree whole heartedly with your Lou and KML comparison. If you could do me a favor, I am just not that familiar with Sveta - her size, strengths weaknesses, personality, competitiveness, scoring, defense, relationship with Geno, etc. If you have time maybe you could bring me (and maybe some other posters) up to snuff.
Some on here said that about Gabby at the beginning of the season. One good game should not get BY'ers to start predicting that Lou has arrived. If she starts missing a lot again some of you may start suggesting Geno replace her with someone else. Give her a few games before making a decision on whether she has found her game.Ill go out on a limb and predict Lou will start the rest of the year - could be wrong but that's my guess !
And another two:And another link to a story i don't remember every reading before.
http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol2no24svet.html
Kind of touching the part about being made to feel like a traitor for not staying in Russia. Would be tough to handle for an 18-year-old. Or anybody else.And another link to a story i don't remember every reading before.
http://espn.go.com/magazine/vol2no24svet.html