Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SimpleDawg, post: 2942381, member: 9267"]
I was asking to DallasBUFan.  I think they were in our class, they just had aspects to their game that was lacking.  They don't have a key scorer.  They have injuries.  Their rebounding is minimal without Holmes. They're very thin in the frontcourt.  Their overall shooting percentage is 6% lower.  They're not used to running and hustling that much.... which we made them do and contributed to a huge turnover margin in our favor.  Sug Sutton has athleticism though, and she shot fadeaways on Danberry and Howard.  I'd say they are in our class physically and have more letter stars than us, but they have too many lacking aspects to make it competitive.   What it really tells me is that Mississippi State is just a more complete team, not necessarily that Texas weren't in our class.

Myah, Bre, and AEH barely had any playing time.  AEH's non-contribution was because Vic doesn't trust her defense.  Vic will play her more vs Oregon because if our defense isn't working well enough against them, he'll ask AEH to shoot to get some points on the board.

ND was definitely a match for UConn.  It was not a blowout by UConn.  It was a 6 point game going into the 4th quarter, yet the game was already over between MsState/Texas going into the 4th.

....
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach