No, your response indicated you have no idea what I was actually saying (again, probably because you were too lazy to read.)
It wasn't that I felt they were ripping me off. It's that there has never been any indication as to how much of one's contribution goes to UConn NIL. Yet people make the claim if you share the information behind their paywall you are hurting UConn NIL. Well, how do you know that? Again, they've never made their contribution % publicly available. If they're giving $1 per month of each subscription to the program, but people are convinced they're giving 8-10, they're technically hurting UConn NIL because they're taking money away that could have been donated directly to the university.
Furthermore, your response "Me, I have no reason to believe they are anything but on the level" is proving my overarching point. There is a contingency of people on here who just assume SC is doing the right thing, despite the fact that a) as noted above there is no evidence to support that and b) there have been numerous NIL collectives that have exploited fans since collectives formed. These people then get mad when you ask the type of question I'm asking right now, or share information from behind their paywall. Information that again, used to be free less than 5 years ago.
If you believe what I'm saying is pointless, care to share some firm info as to how much they're contributing to UConn NIL as I've been asking for?