- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,496
- Reaction Score
- 55,510
Depends on what’s in the story.Bring her down? As long as Kim keeps on winning I don’t see the Post or anyone else bringing her down.
Depends on what’s in the story.Bring her down? As long as Kim keeps on winning I don’t see the Post or anyone else bringing her down.
I hate that the inevitably political debate is going to get lit during the second week of the tournament.+1. This is pretty standard. If anything, he's generating hype for WaPo. And if anyone deserves a hit piece, it's Kim. She's had so many opportunities to take the high road over the years, and forcefully declined to do so at every chance.
Bring her down? As long as Kim keeps on winning I don’t see the Post or anyone else bringing her down. She’s good at what she does and LSU (and their fans) will want her to keep doing it. I suppose it could give WCBB some bad publicity.
Now I wonder why she left Baylor for LSU. This isn't going to be pretty no matter what WAPO prints.I was thinking about her statement over dinner, and I think what she DIDN'T say speaks volumes. She never talked about the questions that were being asked. She never said they were false or misleading. She only whined about the tactics being used to gather the information and tried to discredit the media.
How would she know “ the questions being asked?”I was thinking about her statement over dinner, and I think what she DIDN'T say speaks volumes. She never talked about the questions that were being asked. She never said they were false or misleading. She only whined about the tactics being used to gather the information and tried to discredit the media.
The reporter sent a list of questions.How would she know “ the questions being asked?”
She said she talked to prior coaches, staffs and players who were contacted by the Washington Post. And the reporter sent her a list of questions.How would she know “ the questions being asked?”
I guess as outsiders we have the luxury to not care. But I have already seen people picking apart the comments and posts that players have stated about Mulkey and defending her character. I'm sure no one on the teams knows what she's being accused but the players are likely to be unfairly blamed and criticized for taking up for her when it comes out.I don’t really care when it’s released. If we’re to believe the story, this guy has been trying to get Kim’s input for quite some time. I’m sure he’s using the tournament and his deadline to put pressure on her. But if she really wanted to dispute whatever he’s trying to a claim, she’s had plenty of time to do so. I think she “doth protest too much”. There’s something up…
Schadenfreude for the rest of us?The funny thing is that no matter how bad this hit piece is, Kim isn’t going to care… LSU admins aren’t going to care.. and LSU fans dang sure aren’t going to care. So who is the target audience here?
The fact that Mulkey is coming out this strongly against the article before it’s even published makes me wonder … usually that means someone is cooked.
I would venture to say speculation on a coach leaving for another job is pretty common in the basketball world and while unpleasant is expected. This sounds a lot more serious and way more controversial than a coaching change.I can understand the "why now?" concerns, but how many teams went into the Tourney dealing with speculation about their coach going elsewhere? At least a couple. That isn't fair to the players either, but it happens.
I was thinking about that this morning. I wish all the teams could be left alone this time of year until the tournament is over...but now she's made it nearly impossible for this "story" to go away. She has increased interest over what the story might reveal. Foot-in-mouth disease is a real thing.Unfortunately, her presser with prepared comments may have brought 100+x more focus onto the potential story than Pat Forde's original tweet.