I thought both UCONN and SC returned their FF lineups pretty much intact from last season. Why should UCONN players be shielded from early competition but SC, who has begun the season with the toughest schedule, not have to be? Or more importantly, not want to be. They are hungry.I agree with what you say, GENERALLY. As in teaching children to walk (bad comparison), I would liked to have seen Uconn go against not one of the top 3 teams so early. About 10 games into the season Geno et al would know the weakness and ways to mask them. Paige is terrific but she is just a kid and relatively new to TOP level basketball. AZZI as talented as she is, is still a very green Freshman. The bench is largely composed of kids like this. 18 may say they are Women but inside the kid remains. A different view, opinion. Geno, unlike nearly all other coaches, won't throw his kids into games too big for them, usually. This was one.
and there lies another big point, the benefits of being in a power 5 conference. A couple seasons ago the power 5 added more games in the men's side so that they would get more opportunities to get their teams in the tournament. This off course would cost a mid major or a non power 5 team to not get those opportunities.SC has 16 Conf games. UConn has 20.
They have 40% more non Conf games they can schedule.
I’ve said since day 1 that UConn needs to be lobbying hard to cut the conference sked.
No idea what this sentence means.. A couple seasons ago the power 5 added more games in the men's side .
they added more conference games in the power 5. Instead of 16 I believe it went to 18 or 20.No idea what this sentence means.
Not sure what UConn learned today except they were outmatched by a much more physical opponent.
This game might have done more harm than good. The players' confidence is shot, so is Geno's.
The risk is you overreact or change the wrong things. Does the scheme change, the lineups,?
This team has no identity yet and certainly hasn't gelled. Need this first.

