- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,701
- Reaction Score
- 13,418
BINGO....I don't give Hathaway that much credit. I think he chose to listen to McHugh over Burton.
BINGO....I don't give Hathaway that much credit. I think he chose to listen to McHugh over Burton.
Herbst went to him and made nice. All this kind of guy wants is to be recognized, to be in the loop, an insider. CT Mike is spot on correct as to how you deal with them.If I was Burton I would have walked away from uconn three years ago. I cannot imagine how the athletic department can raise money now.
No he shouldn't. This isn't his fault...in fact, he warned against it.
Thats just dumb
Let's not make Burton a hero here. Was he right that P wasn't up to the job -- sure he was, but so was I and so were many others here. The truth is that Burton's entitled temper tantrum may very well have caused hathaway to feel like he had to hire P or be ceding control of the program.
So did I. Problem is the Burton (with cash) didn't say anything more pertinent that I (without cash) said. Don't hire P. Now? Fire P.
Herbst went to him and made nice. All this kind of guy wants is to be recognized, to be in the loop, an insider. CT Mike is spot on correct as to how you deal with them.
Sorry I had half the thing written and then had to step away, hadn't seen recent posts till after I posted.Holy smokes weyuo!!! How many slippery slopes can we have in one thread?
So why doesn't UCONN hire Mr. Burton as athletic director? Or give him the ability to pick the next coach? The only courtesy he deserved was being told the coaching selection before the general public. That is it.
The first thing I would do if I hit the powerball is offer to pay Mr. Burton the money he spent on UCONN athletics back so that his name could disappear from the facilities.
You are spot on. If you don't treat big donors with respect you lose big donors. How anyone on this board can disagree with that indisputable fact is beyond me.The not so sad fact is that people who contribute millions to college athletic programs expect a say in what goes on. Winning and that legal "say," are really the only ROI expectation available to large boosters. As we have all found out, there ain't no free money in college FB. Further, our sources (TV, attendance) of money are in-process of drying-up. We need our donors, contributors and boosters more than ever. Do you really think that AD's, Coaches and Presidents at SEC, Big-12 or Big-10 conference schools don't spend large blocks of time kissing butts attached to boosters that make Burton look like a beach-day? Hell, Oregon might as well be Nike U. It's not a bad thing to have wealthy people invested in your FB program. In 1A FB, it's an absolute necessity and it is never free.
As far as I can see, all Burton did was send a sharply-worded, somewhat personal complaint letter to the official involved in running an entity in which the author was heavily invested. The whiny, thin skinned recipient, instead of confronting the author personally, leaked info that ultimately led to an FOI request and the letter becoming public.
My guess is that Burton, at this point, feels like he's dumped perfectly good money into a smelly sewer. He might take you up on your offer.