Moving UConn Football Forward - A Message from Athletic Director David Benedict. | Page 9 | The Boneyard
.-.

Moving UConn Football Forward - A Message from Athletic Director David Benedict.

Are you serious??

I hate dealing with low-IQ people, but I'll make an exception. What is your current alternative to the Big East + Independent football?? Is it the AAC? Because we saw how that went and it destroyed most of our revenue sports. So what's your solution, champ?


I read your post and we can agree on one thing - we do all care about UConn athletics. It has been part of my life for decades and I am sure that you have been a fan for decades. However, I am unwilling to to yield to "sound and fury signifying nothing", so I will engage.

As far as where we are now, we have done as well as we can given the circumstances. Benedict has been a very effective AD. The propblem is that the upside is at best limited and may in fact be at risk. The "bitter pill" proposal is the only way I see out of this current conference situation so football can thrive in an appropriate conference. The "bitter pill" means we will probably have to buy in to a conference and it will be expensive and humilitating. Can you imagine writing checks to a conference so a BC or a Syracuse can get full payouts?

As far as conference being important in football, don't believe me - look at the facts. Only one D1 team has made it work as an independent - ND. NBC pays them about $50mm for football only and the ACC pays them about $17 mm for their Olympic sports and a football scheduiling agreement. Further, ND doesn't have to play in a conference championship or even play a difficult schedule to be favored for a CFP spot. Nobody else will get that deal and ND may not keep it the long run. In the Courant article, even Dan Hurley mentioned "conference" among the considerations in Mora's decision.

I hated the AAC experience as much as anyone. (especially the Diaco Civil War dream with UCF) I wouldn't go back there at the point of a gun. At the time we wanted out, the BE was the only realistic option that made sense. But times have changed and the BE is losing the arms race even in basketball. Consider, that 22 of the top 25 teams in the ESPN poll are from P4 conferences. More worrisome, I believe whats coming down the road is a CFP style attempted take over of basketball. The NCAA desparately wants to hold on to March Madness because it alone provides about 80% of their annual revenues. The P4 conferences like the money CFP provides and I believe would like to replicate it (or more) in basketball.

For schools like UConn with no big conference money to spread around, you must hit up donors and the state government. As an example, the ACC full payout last year was about $45mm. Big donors at UConn cross the $100k threshold and are treated like royalty as they should be. To match the ACC payout minus the BE payout you need about 350-400 of them. Thankfully, at the state level, we have Ned Lamont and Matt Ritter as friends. But, that won't last forever.

So what can done? Standing pat is not an option IMO. Because ultimately I think the P4 will prevail.

So pardon me for looking down the road, but we need to stay active conference wise. The BE has provided us with a stage to get our BB feet back on the ground, but now we need help in other ways it simply can't provide.
 
I am just reporting what Marc stated on X. If Marc who I thought was part of the leadership team on raising NIL knows less than you then cool.
It's an easy Google search to find out that we've at least doubled that amount. I don't mind if Marc doesn't do the Google search, but I mind if you don't and then continue to blabber on about it...
 
I read your post and we can agree on one thing - we do all care about UConn athletics. It has been part of my life for decades and I am sure that you have been a fan for decades. However, I am unwilling to to yield to "sound and fury signifying nothing", so I will engage.

As far as where we are now, we have done as well as we can given the circumstances. Benedict has been a very effective AD. The propblem is that the upside is at best limited and may in fact be at risk. The "bitter pill" proposal is the only way I see out of this current conference situation so football can thrive in an appropriate conference. The "bitter pill" means we will probably have to buy in to a conference and it will be expensive and humilitating. Can you imagine writing checks to a conference so a BC or a Syracuse can get full payouts?

As far as conference being important in football, don't believe me - look at the facts. Only one D1 team has made it work as an independent - ND. NBC pays them about $50mm for football only and the ACC pays them about $17 mm for their Olympic sports and a football scheduiling agreement. Further, ND doesn't have to play in a conference championship or even play a difficult schedule to be favored for a CFP spot. Nobody else will get that deal and ND may not keep it the long run. In the Courant article, even Dan Hurley mentioned "conference" among the considerations in Mora's decision.

I hated the AAC experience as much as anyone. (especially the Diaco Civil War dream with UCF) I wouldn't go back there at the point of a gun. At the time we wanted out, the BE was the only realistic option that made sense. But times have changed and the BE is losing the arms race even in basketball. Consider, that 22 of the top 25 teams in the ESPN poll are from P4 conferences. More worrisome, I believe whats coming down the road is a CFP style attempted take over of basketball. The NCAA desparately wants to hold on to March Madness because it alone provides about 80% of their annual revenues. The P4 conferences like the money CFP provides and I believe would like to replicate it (or more) in basketball.

For schools like UConn with no big conference money to spread around, you must hit up donors and the state government. As an example, the ACC full payout last year was about $45mm. Big donors at UConn cross the $100k threshold and are treated like royalty as they should be. To match the ACC payout minus the BE payout you need about 350-400 of them. Thankfully, at the state level, we have Ned Lamont and Matt Ritter as friends. But, that won't last forever.

So what can done? Standing pat is not an option IMO. Because ultimately I think the P4 will prevail.

So pardon me for looking down the road, but we need to stay active conference wise. The BE has provided us with a stage to get our BB feet back on the ground, but now we need help in other ways it simply can't provide.
I will keep it civil in the same spirit that you've chosen to in this recent post.

Of course we'd be better served having a conference where both money and scheduling are guaranteed. But I'm going to "pressure test" your suggestion of paying a conference to get in.

Which conference are you suggesting we pay to get into?? And how much would the payment need to be? I'm going to ask you to at least provide a semblance of data that the payment and conference that you suggest would go successfully. In other words, don't suggest to me "ACC, let's offer them the deal that SMU offered them". Because even if we offered to forego 9 years of tv money at 24 million each, you've gotta demonstrate that we'd get the votes to get in, which we already know we don't have...
 
Basically, if we had more NIL for this season, we could've spent more on defense, not gone 0-3 in OT games and been in consideration for the college football playoffs. We were so one-sided on NIL on the offensive side. It was glaring what happened. To succeed, you need enough NIL resources to support a balanced roster on both sides of the ball. Mora had to have realized that too.
 
.-.
It's an easy Google search to find out that we've at least doubled that amount. I don't mind if Marc doesn't do the Google search, but I mind if you don't and then continue to blabber on about it...
Marc should pipe down. If you don't know, your "estimations" do more harm than good.

Also his UCLA claims are absurd. We know they paid handsomely for their QB to come from Tennessee but aside from that they have less money than the 1 million UConn had for the whole team.

You don't have to be Matt Patricia to see how easily his claims fall apart.
 
It seems the AAC would be a good fit for football. But we would have to give them something in return. How about football and women basketball go to AAC only. Everything else stays Big East.
I wonder if AAC would go for it. Our woman’s basketball program is # 1. And a good asset

tha GIF
 
Basically, if we had more NIL for this season, we could've spent more on defense, not gone 0-3 in OT games and been in consideration for the college football playoffs. We were so one-sided on NIL on the offensive side. It was glaring what happened. To succeed, you need enough NIL resources to support a balanced roster on both sides of the ball. Mora had to have realized that too.

Well considering he was the decision maker on NIL then he only has himself to blame.

I mean we are probably still paying Nick Evers. Come on.
 
It seems the AAC would be a good fit for football. But we would have to give them something in return. How about football and women basketball go to AAC only. Everything else stays Big East.
@Nicklo28 Absolutely not possible, see NCAA rules. Current FBS independent football UConn could move to a FBS conference as a football-only member. However, NCAA rules prohibit other UConn D1-level Big East member sports moving to other D1 conferences. UConn hockey could move from Hockey East to join B1G, because the Big East has no hockey.

Unlike UConn football, Army and Navy can be AAC football members as the Patriot League only offers FCS-level football.
 
@Nicklo28 Absolutely not possible, see NCAA rules. Current FBS independent football UConn could move to a FBS conference as a football-only member. However, NCAA rules prohibit other UConn D1-level Big East member sports moving to other D1 conferences. UConn hockey could move from Hockey East to join B1G, because the Big East has no hockey.

Unlike UConn football, Army and Navy can be AAC football members as the Patriot League only offers FCS-level football.
I think its that if a conference offers a sport you are obligated into it
 
.-.
Is Marc correct that UConn football NIL was only around $1 million for 2025? This amount would make more sense since we struck out on the defensive side of the ball this year obtaining players in the portal and lost two of our best defensive linemen to the portal.
It doesn't seem correct.

From article dated August 28, 2024:

In bringing in 50-plus new players this season, UConn spread more than $1 million into the hands of 20-plus recruits from the transfer portal, many of them, like Evers, having come from power programs. The goal is for $2-3 million to be shared with, say, 40 players of high expectations next offseason, giving UConn the size, depth and talent needed in an effort to show that the program can be more than something basketball and university support drags along.
“I’m not sure how many people did more than we did, in the Group of Five,” Benedict said of programs unaffiliated with power conferences. “It’s difficult to say where we stand because there’s no ledger of, here’s the list of what everyone did around the country in the Group of Five. But if we’re not in the top five, I’d be surprised.

“The realty of a year ago is, there was no emphasis on it. There wasn’t a plan. It was still something that, collectively, everyone was trying to figure out the best approach with. Last year, we made a decision that this was something we had to get in the business of and we quickly were able to organize and have people lead an effort that aggregated resources that put us in the very top echelon in the Group of Five.”
 
not gone 0-3 in OT games and been in consideration for the college football playoffs

Right now we have no path to be in consideration for the playoffs - even going 12-0. With no conference championship the only way we get in is as an at large, meaning we would have to be ranked in the top 7 of the remaining non conference champions. Do you really think a 12-0 UConn with our schedule is ranked higher and gets in over say a 10-2 Oklahoma who played an SEC schedule?
 
Right now we have no path to be in consideration for the playoffs - even going 12-0. With no conference championship the only way we get in is as an at large, meaning we would have to be ranked in the top 7 of the remaining non conference champions. Do you really think a 12-0 UConn with our schedule is ranked higher and gets in over say a 10-2 Oklahoma who played an SEC schedule?

I honestly don’t care. Being in the conversation would be plenty of excitement for right now. We’re trying to get into a P4, not win a national championship. That’s the aspiration for the moment.
 
I’m not sure why folks expected some level of loyalty from Mora to UCONN. That simply does not exist today in college athletics. The coaches are subject to expectations that require immediate success or they’re out. Players hit the portal for the most money.
 
.-.
I honestly don’t care. Being in the conversation would be plenty of excitement for right now. We’re trying to get into a P4, not win a national championship. That’s the aspiration for the moment.
That is exactly right. People don’t understand where UConn basketball was when Calhoun arrived. Nobody except maybe Jim Calhoun ever expected to win a national championship, let alone 6. If you told UConn fans they would make the tournament every other year, most would have signed up for that in a heartbeat. People were crying with joy, literally, at winning the NIT.

The point is don’t worry about getting into the playoffs right now. Enjoy winning
 
That is exactly right. People don’t understand where UConn basketball was when Calhoun arrived. Nobody except maybe Jim Calhoun ever expected to win a national championship, let alone 6. If you told UConn fans they would make the tournament every other year, most would have signed up for that in a heartbeat. People were crying with joy, literally, at winning the NIT.

The point is don’t worry about getting into the playoffs right now. Enjoy winning

Winning the NIT was a big deal for me. Also, the first big wins over St. John’s and Georgetown, were a huge breakthrough.
 
Winning the NIT was a big deal for me. Also, the first big wins over St. John’s and Georgetown, were a huge breakthrough.
Nine years from those two games to the natty. It was great just being in the mix almost every year. Like now.
 
9 years. Exactly. It was fun, frustrating and exciting, but if I told you we’d win a a national championship after the NIT nobody would have believed it.
 

Online statistics

Members online
415
Guests online
4,462
Total visitors
4,877

Forum statistics

Threads
165,435
Messages
4,438,376
Members
10,300
Latest member
DJHurlhoun


Top Bottom