- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Messages
- 1,670
- Reaction Score
- 5,195
Hey! I score, I don't have to play defense! (Sveta)As Rebecca Lobo once noted (after Svet pointed out to Geno that she had “only” two fouls):
”You might think it, but you don’t say it”
Hey! I score, I don't have to play defense! (Sveta)As Rebecca Lobo once noted (after Svet pointed out to Geno that she had “only” two fouls):
”You might think it, but you don’t say it”
Most , if not all is accurate., I agree. I'm a purist with a compassionate bend. I don't believe players should be paid. They are not. (at least on the surface). Some, a few, Coaches are way way overpaid. Big schools have big money, smaller schools have less. Economics 101??? The problem is one of "fairness".My whipping point has long been college coaching salaries, which are exorbitant - at least in the abstract - in football, men's basketball, major women's basketball and a few isolated "star" coaches in other sports.
I constantly get criticism for this, as though I am saying they don't somehow deserve it or shouldn't get paid. Not at all. I am objecting to the fact they have risen to this point, not that we should then go backwards. It is what it is, at this point.
What I am also saying is that as coaching salaries escalated, as well as the facilities wars, it has become clear that schools are making - or at least spending - a lot of money on their sports. None of it particularly shared with the athletes. Like @MSSportsGuy I long thought the education was enough for the athletes, but it has become clear that a lot of them - while thankfully getting education, I suppose - are not there for that reason, really and the schools only care about on-field / court performances.
Disaster that the NIL is working at being - it is the way in the new, really pro-style college sports.
As opposed to doing it illegally, which they have been doing for many decades? And NIL isn't a bunch of alums funneling cash to recruits. At least not in wcbb. If they weren't doing it before NIL they won't now.Saban is most assuredly a cranky old man. But his complaint is not completely unfounded. Around the country, well-healed alums are attempting to figure out the best way to “legally” entice top recruits within the patchwork of state NIL rules.
Most , if not all is accurate., I agree. I'm a purist with a compassionate bend. I don't believe players should be paid. They are not. (at least on the surface). Some, a few, Coaches are way way overpaid. Big schools have big money, smaller schools have less. Economics 101??? The problem is one of "fairness".
When the likes of Paige and Fudd Arnold are no longer recruit-able, what then happens to Uconn's teams?
To me it is on the cutting edge of "immoral" for schools to pay players to advertise their own school~~
If coaches make 3 million or 10 million annually for and around coaching--the kids doing the physical work deserve a share. It becomes a circular argument. Big schools big money --players get money, no money no NCAA big game--no recruiting--
I consider my life as an Observer of the Human condition. Whom ever said: Money corrupts and big money corrupts completely. Knew how money effects "weak" people. However, it has been proven that Big money corrupts those once thought incorruptible or at least considered to be so. However, no phrase or statement will ever be a blanket covering all approached. Some decent honest people are actually honest and decent.As opposed to doing it illegally, which they have been doing for many decades? And NIL isn't a bunch of alums funneling cash to recruits. At least not in wcbb. If they weren't doing it before NIL they won't now.
It's all about money. Go to a UConn football or basketball game and you have to pay to get in. And everyone but the fans and the players are getting paid to put the game on. It's a charade to pretend that D1 college basketball or football is amateur athletics. At least now the athletes can declare the income and pay taxes on it like the rest of us.
And that is why in a few years no one will care about what will be a minor league. Except for a few schools everyone else will find other things to do.I consider my life as an Observer of the Human condition. Whom ever said: Money corrupts and big money corrupts completely. Knew how money effects "weak" people. However, it has been proven that Big money corrupts those once thought incorruptible or at least considered to be so. However, no phrase or statement will ever be a blanket covering all approached. Some decent honest people are actually honest and decent.
NIL money, will not corrupt the players. Corrupt colleges or coaches or "business" men with something to gain are the bane of people actually trying to make an apparent unfair system fair.
There was a time in the Olympic games when the Soviet Union and EasterBloc paid player/ Olympians, from cradle to adulthood to be professional athletes. Finally, with the Dream Team America saw the wisdom of professionals playing against professionals (i.e. paid performers). That to me is what NIL is attempting to do.
It could also turn ugly from a fan perspective. From rooting for your school’s team to screaming. “You’re a millionaire now and playing like $&#@#”. Or a players perspective “ they made her a millionaire and I’m the leading scorer”.
The goal in all of this was to compensate athletes. If the NCAA and conferences sat down and got serious, they could have come up with a manageable plan that could have been controlled. Instead we have . So, there will be blood in the streets.