You know, I do think that after doing a little self imposed, as objective analysis as possible, Joe Moorhead should be a candidate - at least to find out if there is interest, to be the head coach at UCONN.
It's actually got nothing to do with his connections to UCONN, but everything to do with his ability to generate wins as a head coach, knowledge of the recruiting area (Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, Maryland - northeast, and his age and ability to connect to players. We need to be pulling players out of Florida and Texas too, and but that's secondary recruiting territory knowledge - assistant coach jobs......
It's funny, but I spent a few minutes just looking for winning coaches right now in all levels, and put a little age filter on it, and Moorhead comes out right near the top of the list. The guy is younger than I am, and I don't know what he makes at Fordham right now, but I'd bet he'd be interested.
And that is always the key in any hire - both sides have to be interested, and it's a good idea if you can manage to get the interest on both sides, to extend beyond the $ amount.
I'd bet that Moorhead is on the list, he'd be on my list. As would Ambrose, and again, nothing to do with actually having been at UCONN before. When you look at age, winning coaches, and then think about who knows the recruiting territory - those two guys fit. There are others, BCS/FBS division 1, division 2, division 3.....but they are pretty much the list for 1-AA coaches that fit the profile I can come up with.
I think it's important that the next coach that comes in, be a young guy, with a lot of ambition to be great at the top level of college football. In fact, it's most important in what I'm looking for.