- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,149
- Reaction Score
- 8,314
2014 was more improbably because they showed nothing during the year, and didn't even win a weak conference tournament. The 2011 team never lost in tournament play and played well throughout the year, despite struggling in a tough Big East conference.
2011 was more impactful given that we hadn't seen anything like that before. 2014 lost a bit of its shine, if you can say that, because 2011 happened so recently.
What was so weak about the AAC tournament? Playing 3 top 20 teams in consecutive days and beating two of them?