sounds like there will be at least one change in the coaching staff next season...
Everyone knows that there will be many changes to the coaching staff. UConn/PP was in a very unique situation last year. Because of the way that FUHCRE snuck out of town last year, all of the assistants had already signed their contracts with UConn right before Edsall left town. So UConn was on the hook for all of their salaries whether they were on the staff or not. That is why basically any coach who wanted to stay got to stay..whether PP really wanted them to stay or not. Now that their contracts are up, many of them will be moving on.
I'm sorry -- I thought Edsall left too quickly after the bowl game, and was the antichrist for not coming back to CT and holding a player meeting before he and Maryland announced he was coming there. I didn't realize that, at the same time he left too quickly, he was to be criticized for leaving too late in the process for his assitants to get on with their lives. My bad.
LMFAO.
I'm sorry -- I thought Edsall left too quickly after the bowl game, and was the antichrist for not coming back to CT and holding a player meeting before he and Maryland announced he was coming there. I didn't realize that, at the same time he left too quickly, he was to be criticized for leaving too late in the process for his assitants to get on with their lives. My bad.
LMFAO.
Everyone knows that there will be many changes to the coaching staff. UConn/PP was in a very unique situation last year. Because of the way that FUHCRE snuck out of town last year, all of the assistants had already signed their contracts with UConn right before Edsall left town. So UConn was on the hook for all of their salaries whether they were on the staff or not. That is why basically any coach who wanted to stay got to stay..whether PP really wanted them to stay or not. Now that their contracts are up, many of them will be moving on.
That seems like a pretty reasonable explanation. But just out of curiosity ... was Edsall contractually handcuffed to his new Maryland assistants the same way P was handcuffed to Edsall's?
I know a lot has been made of this point on this forum over the past year, and without having been in the room when the announcement was made, I can't help but think this was a GOOD thing Edsall did. The end of the BCS game was the last time that specific team was ever going to be together again as a team, and it was the last time Todman was going to be a part of that team. Todman choosing to go pro at the time was a POSITIVE thing, so I simply took Edsall's push to have Todman announce it to the team as a thing to CELEBRATE with teammates. They were bummed after losing of course, and this was something positive they could all enjoy together as a team. I simply saw that as a move by a coach to give everyone a chance to publically (meaning, in front of the whole team) congratulate Todman and give him the chance to go around and give/get hugs as they wrapped up the season. The end of any season is emotional, and this was a huge milestone for Todman and the team-one of their own was announcing his intentions to go on to the next level-something they all aspire to do. That was something to celebrate, and celebrate together. It wouldn't have had the same emotional impact if it were done "after the fact" when everyone returned to campus for the start of the next semester a couple weeks later.When Edsall made Toddman inform the team of his NFL intentions and then shortly thereafter he snuck out the back door, he lost a ton of credibility.
That seems like a pretty reasonable explanation. But just out of curiosity ... was Edsall contractually handcuffed to his new Maryland assistants the same way P was handcuffed to Edsall's?
I know a lot has been made of this point on this forum over the past year, and without having been in the room when the announcement was made, I can't help but think this was a GOOD thing Edsall did. The end of the BCS game was the last time that specific team was ever going to be together again as a team, and it was the last time Todman was going to be a part of that team. Todman choosing to go pro at the time was a POSITIVE thing, so I simply took Edsall's push to have Todman announce it to the team as a thing to CELEBRATE with teammates. They were bummed after losing of course, and this was something positive they could all enjoy together as a team. I simply saw that as a move by a coach to give everyone a chance to publically (meaning, in front of the whole team) congratulate Todman and give him the chance to go around and give/get hugs as they wrapped up the season. The end of any season is emotional, and this was a huge milestone for Todman and the team-one of their own was announcing his intentions to go on to the next level-something they all aspire to do. That was something to celebrate, and celebrate together. It wouldn't have had the same emotional impact if it were done "after the fact" when everyone returned to campus for the start of the next semester a couple weeks later.
Again, I wasn't in the room of course when the announcement was made so I'm not trying to say definitively this is how it went in the locker room. But as a coach of 36 seasons in football, basketball, and Track & Field, this is how I interpreted that report. If there were follow-up reports in the papers that noted players complaining about how it was done I must have missed them, and I apologize. I am basing my thoughts above solely on how I have seen the locker room player/coach dynamic play out in my experience.
Good point and the right thing to do, BUT!, right after the guys are shedding tears of happiness for their teammate.I know a lot has been made of this point on this forum over the past year, and without having been in the room when the announcement was made, I can't help but think this was a GOOD thing Edsall did. The end of the BCS game was the last time that specific team was ever going to be together again as a team, and it was the last time Todman was going to be a part of that team. Todman choosing to go pro at the time was a POSITIVE thing, so I simply took Edsall's push to have Todman announce it to the team as a thing to CELEBRATE with teammates. They were bummed after losing of course, and this was something positive they could all enjoy together as a team. I simply saw that as a move by a coach to give everyone a chance to publically (meaning, in front of the whole team) congratulate Todman and give him the chance to go around and give/get hugs as they wrapped up the season. The end of any season is emotional, and this was a huge milestone for Todman and the team-one of their own was announcing his intentions to go on to the next level-something they all aspire to do. That was something to celebrate, and celebrate together. It wouldn't have had the same emotional impact if it were done "after the fact" when everyone returned to campus for the start of the next semester a couple weeks later.
Again, I wasn't in the room of course when the announcement was made so I'm not trying to say definitively this is how it went in the locker room. But as a coach of 36 seasons in football, basketball, and Track & Field, this is how I interpreted that report. If there were follow-up reports in the papers that noted players complaining about how it was done I must have missed them, and I apologize. I am basing my thoughts above solely on how I have seen the locker room player/coach dynamic play out in my experience.
Sadly-I agree. There wasn't a bigger Edsall fan on this board than me. I knew he was far from perfect, but I LOVED having him here as a fan, and I enjoyed working with him as a HS coach. I was shocked and disgusted that he didn't say good-bye to the team the right way. I appreciate greatly what he did in his 12 years at UCONN, but hated the way he left.Good point and the right thing to do, BUT!, right after the guys are shedding tears of happiness for their teammate.
The coach walks out the lockerroom door never to be seen again.
Talk about buzz kill.
Sending your kid off to college to play football is like sending him off to join the army.Sadly-I agree. There wasn't a bigger Edsall fan on this board than me. I knew he was far from perfect, but I LOVED having him here as a fan, and I enjoyed working with him as a HS coach. I was shocked and disgusted that he didn't say good-bye to the team the right way. I appreciate greatly what he did in his 12 years at UCONN, but hated the way he left.
Hehe, for hating all the FUCRE threads so much, you certainly are always in the thick of it.I'm sorry -- I thought Edsall left too quickly after the bowl game, and was the antichrist for not coming back to CT and holding a player meeting before he and Maryland announced he was coming there. I didn't realize that, at the same time he left too quickly, he was to be criticized for leaving too late in the process for his assitants to get on with their lives. My bad.
LMFAO.
Hehe, for hating all the FUCRE threads so much, you certainly are always in the thick of it.
The last one I started was when?
I know a lot has been made of this point on this forum over the past year, and without having been in the room when the announcement was made, I can't help but think this was a GOOD thing Edsall did. The end of the BCS game was the last time that specific team was ever going to be together again as a team, and it was the last time Todman was going to be a part of that team. Todman choosing to go pro at the time was a POSITIVE thing, so I simply took Edsall's push to have Todman announce it to the team as a thing to CELEBRATE with teammates. They were bummed after losing of course, and this was something positive they could all enjoy together as a team. I simply saw that as a move by a coach to give everyone a chance to publically (meaning, in front of the whole team) congratulate Todman and give him the chance to go around and give/get hugs as they wrapped up the season. The end of any season is emotional, and this was a huge milestone for Todman and the team-one of their own was announcing his intentions to go on to the next level-something they all aspire to do. That was something to celebrate, and celebrate together. It wouldn't have had the same emotional impact if it were done "after the fact" when everyone returned to campus for the start of the next semester a couple weeks later.
Again, I wasn't in the room of course when the announcement was made so I'm not trying to say definitively this is how it went in the locker room. But as a coach of 36 seasons in football, basketball, and Track & Field, this is how I interpreted that report. If there were follow-up reports in the papers that noted players complaining about how it was done I must have missed them, and I apologize. I am basing my thoughts above solely on how I have seen the locker room player/coach dynamic play out in my experience.
It isn't about the timing relative to season/bowl games. It is as much on Hathaway as it was on Edsall's timing. But usually if a coach is looking at leaving, the AD at least has a clue about it and doesn't sign the assistants to a contract before finalizing that the HC will still be there. In this instance, JH had absolutely no clue that Edsall was looking at leaving and signed all of the assistants to their 1-year contract. Then Edsall left out the back door (I will leave how he left to another debate/discussion, as that is a separate issue). This left UConn in the extremely unique situation of having all of your assistants locked into a 1 year contact while the head coach has left town. That almost never happens (as most AD's aren't dumb enough to get themselves in that situation). I am sure this is just another one of the 'f&ck ups' that was on the list of Hathaway's problems when Herbst evaluated his performance.
Part of the issue with the timing of signing the assistant coaches last year is that UConn is one of only a few (maybe the only) schools whose contracts run on a calendar year. Most schools coaches' contracts are from July 1 - June 30. If those assistants weren't signed on New Year's eve last year, which is exactly the day they all got their contracts, they would've been coaching without contracts in the Fiesta Bowl. FHCRE has his faults but it was Hathaway that was late in getting the guys signed. And if the contractual calendar at UConn was normal, it wouldn't have mattered. The assistants would've been under contract through June 30 instead of through the 2011 season and ending on 12/31.