- Joined
- Apr 1, 2018
- Messages
- 439
- Reaction Score
- 800
I was surprised she wasn’t ejected for that.
They did it for Dean at UCLA first, so at least they were consistent.I sort of think she misses a lot of them. I assume she's just rushing a bit because she's not completely comfortable.
This game has reminded me what a gift the NCAA gave Miss State by randomly deciding to change the eligibility rules for Danberry.
Just have to ask, at what point is a win not a win?It was an ugly game but a win is a win at this point. Take the win, get better and move forward.
AEH needs to ride the bench at this point
Earlier in the year Coach Schaefer said he was looking for someone to be a perimeter stopper. I see X Wiggins stepped up. Having her out there really allows switching on defense without a lot of mismatches created.Wiggins has more upside than her right now, and I didn't see that coming.
Poor sportsmanship by Jackson there. She should have been ejected.
After looking at how much Danberry played over her career , I think they made a fair decision in her case. She only played in 6 games as a Sophomore (2016-2017) and Arkansas played 30 games that year. The rule says you cannot play in more than 20% of your teams games. In this case she did not exceed 20%.
Obviously, I have no idea what circumstances others have encountered but in her case, it appears the right decision was made.
He has it mixed up with medical. I forget how many games you can play before redshirting. I think it is 4 or 5. I believe Danberry was slightly out of the range.Are you talking about the medical redshirt rule? What is 20%?
After looking at how much Danberry played over her career , I think they made a fair decision in her case. She only played in 6 games as a Sophomore (2016-2017) and Arkansas played 30 games that year. The rule says you cannot play in more than 20% of your teams games. In this case she did not exceed 20%.
Maybe playing for Jimmy Dykes gets a cruel and unusual punishment exemption.You've got a misunderstanding layered on top of a misinterpretation here.
There's no 20% rule. There's a 30% rule, but that's for a medical hardship waiver, which obviously doesn't apply here because she didn't sustain a season-ending injury. She simply transferred.
At least he took Arkansas to the NCAA tournament in his first year there, something Neighbors hasn't done yet in two yearsMaybe playing for Jimmy Dykes gets a cruel and unusual punishment exemption.
I think this could be a trap game for MSU for sure. I'm still not convinced that we are a good as the polls indicate given I've read about some pretty good showings verses some rather pedestrian play.
Problem is there is no set rules in regards to transfers, I do not understand many of the NCAA decisions with regard to transfer eligibility. Some cases are almost identical and the NCAA gives different decisions. Transfer eligibility is an area the NCAA needs to clear up, there should be straight forward and simple criteria used to make these decisions.You've got a misunderstanding layered on top of a misinterpretation here.
There's no 20% rule. There's a 30% rule, but that's for a medical hardship waiver, which obviously doesn't apply here because she didn't sustain a season-ending injury. She simply transferred.