Michelle Obama visits US Bball W Team

[Husky7882]

 

[speedoo]

Doug's big grin says he is enjoying being around another Chicago native.. Catch, too.

 

[MilfordHusky]

Maya is in a lot of pics in London. Good for her!

 

[meyers7]

That's nice.

 

[Icebear]

That's nice.

Yes, she is.

 

[meyers7]

Yes, she is.

Well I don't know about "her" (don't know her, never met her), but the gesture was nice.

 

[HuskyNan]

Well I don't know about "her" (don't know her, never met her), but the gesture was nice.

I believe ice was referring to Maya, not Mrs. Obama although Mrs. O seems very nice as well.

 

[meyers7]

I believe ice was referring to Maya, not Mrs. Obama although Mrs. O seems very nice as well.

I don't think so....knowing ice. But again, I don't know Mrs. O so I can't really say.

 

[Icebear]

I don't think so....knowing ice. But again, I don't know Mrs. O so I can't really say.

I did mean Maya. She is always sweet as honey.

 

[meyers7]

I did mean Maya.

Then why would you quote me?

 

[Icebear]

Because you response seemed to be in response to Milford above you about Maya in pics. Since you quoted no one.

 

[meyers7]

Because you response seemed to be in response to Milford above you about Maya in pics. Since you quoted no one.

If I don't quote anyone then I am responding to the thread.

"Michelle Obama visits US Bball W Team"

That's nice. I know what you were really after.

 

[JS]

Because your response seemed to be in response to Milford

There's where you went wrong. It's all clear to me now.

If you respond to Meyers' response, inaccurately calling it a response to Milford's response, which was clearly a response to the thread, then your response is unresponsive to Meyers' response, which was likewise to the thread, as he pointed out in his response to you, so there's in fact no response to Milford's response, and any new responder to his response will be a . . .

 

[OneTrickPony]

There's where you went wrong. It's all clear to me now.

If you respond to Meyers' response, inaccurately calling it a response to Milford's response, which was clearly a response to the thread, then your response is unresponsive to Meyers' response, which was likewise to the thread, as he pointed out in his response to you, so there's in fact no response to Milford's response, and any new responder to his response will be a . . .

Now you guys have lost me again...

 

[Icebear]

Please be careful in referring to anyone involved with Meyers as a first Responder. It may cause him undue stress given his recent events and surgery.

 

[meyers7]

There's where you went wrong. It's all clear to me now.

If you respond to Meyers' response, inaccurately calling it a response to Milford's response, which was clearly a response to the thread, then your response is unresponsive to Meyers' response, which was likewise to the thread, as he pointed out in his response to you, so there's in fact no response to Milford's response, and any new responder to his response will be a . . .

It seemed so simple to me.

 

[meyers7]

Please be careful in referring to anyone involved with Meyers as a first Responder. It may cause him undue stress given his recent events and surgery.

They let me start running, er jogging, er shuffling a little bit in rehab. 12 weeks out now.

 

[Icebear]

They let me start running, er jogging, er shuffling a little bit in rehab. 12 weeks out now.

Great to hear.