- Joined
- Nov 20, 2021
- Messages
- 321
- Reaction Score
- 2,016
They don't take a ton of 3's usually though, the Houston game was an outlier. They only average 20.4 attempts per game on the season which is 237th in the country. And they like to play relatively fast, so adjusted for pace it's actually even lower in terms of the % of points they get from 3's (28.4% of their points come from 3's despite the high 3P%, which is 259th)they shot only eight (!!!) threes against texas, and made two of them.
compare that to the houston game, where they took 25 and made 11. pack alone made 7/10.
They don't take a ton of 3's usually though, the Houston game was an outlier. They only average 20.4 attempts per game on the season which is 237th in the country. And they like to play relatively fast, so adjusted for pace it's actually even lower in terms of the % of points they get from 3's (28.4% of their points come from 3's despite the high 3P%, which is 259th)
I believe you mean to say tournament, not seasonOmier is very good and part of the reason why I picked Drake to beat Miami in the first round was due to Omier’s questionable status entering the season.
The Miami posters are discussing the right topic (can UConn defend Miami's guards), but are making the wrong conclusion.View attachment 86121I don’t i’ve seen a group more obnoxious than this miami bunch.
Maryland shot 72% from 2. That’s a bad loss.As far as bad losses are concerned, Maryland is a tournament team. Game was on the road no less. So not really a horrible loss.
Hopefully we can take advantage of their perimeter defense. I think they'll struggle to fight through screens and find shooters.
We will see. In
It jumped off the screen how little Miami had to respect Bishop both offensively and defensively. He was a total non-factor.Both Houston and Texas are great defensive teams no doubt about it, but both of those teams are small. Their starting guards are 6' tall, which is the same size as Miami. Our smallest guard is 6'5". It will be interesting to see how much of a difference that makes.
I also felt that Houston was one of the most overrated teams in the country this year. I was never impressed by watching them, same with Purdue. And Miami barely beat Texas without their starting center. Christian Bishop stinks
So their offense is on fire, but their defense sucks. UT was missing their rim protector.UConn & Miami Defense in March:
Yup, and the Miami center still had 4 fouls. I think that's gonna be the key for us, we need to get him into early foul trouble. And at the other end of the court, keep Miami off the FT line. I think they went like 25-27 from the FT line in the 2nd half alone. They lose in a blowout if Texas doesn't foul them on every possessionIt jumped off the screen how little Miami had to respect Bishop both offensively and defensively. He was a total non-factor.
View attachment 86121I don’t i’ve seen a group more obnoxious than this miami bunch.
So we're good at the rim, good at top-of-the-key and wing 3s, but bad at corner 3s and at midrange stuff which we don't take a lot of anyway. They're bad at defending the right side, including perimeter and midrange. So-so defending the rim.UConn & Miami Offense in March:
Was that bad Texas defense or a favorable whistle for Larranaga?Yup, and the Miami center still had 4 fouls. I think that's gonna be the key for us, we need to get him into early foul trouble. And at the other end of the court, keep Miami off the FT line. I think they went like 25-27 from the FT line in the 2nd half alone. They lose in a blowout if Texas doesn't foul them on every possession
Agree. One of the common denominators in all their losses is not getting to the free throw line. Keeping them off the line and getting their center in foul trouble is key, as Miami does not have any size/bulk behind him. I agree on the concerns about 3 point shooting in a dome setting, as sight lines can be more difficult for players. However, that can also be true of many of the shots Miami takes which are longer 2s. I think a team like Marquette is a good comp for Miami in the sense that they rely on taking you off the dribble for kickouts or mid-range 2s and don't have a lot of size underneath. I think Marquette is a much better defensive team than Miami, and the way to beat UConn is to get in their face and challenge them especially off the dribble. Not sure Miami has the ability to do that, as they are a smaller team than even Marquette. Key will be UConn's ability to defend Miami's penetration, as well as whether Miami can rebound with UConn. Also interesting, will Miami zone UConn and defy them to hit 3s (and will UConn return the favor by zoning Miami to stop their penetration)? Honestly, glad UConn got this matchup on Saturday and not potentially on Monday, as it gives Hurley ample time to scout and prepare for what is a terrific offensive team who is playing at a very high level. Should be an entertaining game with lots of offense.So we're good at the rim, good at top-of-the-key and wing 3s, but bad at corner 3s and at midrange stuff which we don't take a lot of anyway. They're bad at defending the right side, including perimeter and midrange. So-so defending the rim.
This is going to have to be a game for Newton to drive and score or get fouled. Officiating will be a big factor here, which makes me nervous. If we get Jeff Anderson, we're screwed.
They're good in the midrange and at corner 3s (which I feel like we've struggled to defend at times), but only so-so at the rim and elsewhere on the perimeter. We've defended almost everywhere well, except some midrange spots and maybe the right side for 3s (including the corner).
As I said above, this is going to come down to whether they hit a ridiculous percentage in the midrange or get foul calls in their favor.
This guy needs a courtesy hanging.UConn by 25. It’s in the bag!
Agree. One of the common denominators in all their losses is not getting to the free throw line. Keeping them off the line and getting their center in foul trouble is key, as Miami does not have any size/bulk behind him. I agree on the concerns about 3 point shooting in a dome setting, as sight lines can be more difficult for players. However, that can also be true of many of the shots Miami takes which are longer 2s. I think a team like Marquette is a good comp for Miami in the sense that they rely on taking you off the dribble for kickouts or mid-range 2s and don't have a lot of size underneath. I think Marquette is a much better defensive team than Miami, and the way to beat UConn is to get in their face and challenge them especially off the dribble. Not sure Miami has the ability to do that, as they are a smaller team than even Marquette. Key will be UConn's ability to defend Miami's penetration, as well as whether Miami can rebound with UConn. Also interesting, will Miami zone UConn and defy them to hit 3s (and will UConn return the favor by zoning Miami to stop their penetration)? Honestly, glad UConn got this matchup on Saturday and not potentially on Monday, as it gives Hurley ample time to scout and prepare for what is a terrific offensive team who is playing at a very high level. Should be an entertaining game with lots of offense.
Maybe they don't know that we just held the #1 rated offense in the country to 54 pointsThe Miami posters are discussing the right topic (can UConn defend Miami's guards), but are making the wrong conclusion.
I agree. But the focus for UConn has and will be Miami because you can't play Monday unless you win Saturday. Miami is probably the most difficult of the 3 teams to prep for, so glad they play them Saturday.FWIW, All 4 teams' coaching staffs will have good scouts prepared for all 3 other teams heading into the weekend. Any scouting/prepping done from Saturday to Monday will be "fine-tuning" things...