Maybe not Fishy, but he clearly has the power to let us play in the BET. Why not do it? What does he have to lose?
Why can't he? This was an administrative decision. There was no vote on it correct? It matters because we sure as hell ought to be there for the last dance in the Garden.
The schools' presidents came up with the concept of banning ineligible schools from postseason tournaments in March and then voted it into 'law' in the fall.
Aresco is TV Boy, not Administrator Boy.
He also came up with the idea of Tulane...wow, that sorta backfired, eh?
Ah I did not realize that. Suzie ought to be making the case then, with Aresco supporting it. I don't think that her doing the happy dance when she thought we were going to the ACC will help our cause.The schools' presidents came up with the concept of banning ineligible schools from postseason tournaments in March and then voted it into 'law' in the fall.
Aresco is TV Boy, not Administrator Boy.
He also came up with the idea of Tulane...wow, that sorta backfired, eh?
A good salesmen can sell ice to Eskimos, but he first he needs the ice. Aresco is standing there with a warm puddle at his feet that may or may not be water. That’s a much harder case to make. To get people to pay you for nothing, you need a con man not a salesman. We may need to dump Aresco for Madoff or, god forbid, Calipari.Wait, I thought he was the brilliant TV mind set to lead everyone to the higher ground et al?
I seem to recall a few posters spending time discussing the academic shortcomings of some of our new memebers.I believe part of the reason why Tulane was added was due to its past BCS rankings. Remember new formula for playoff distribution is based on BCS rankings from 1998 to present. Tulane had a few good years back in the days. It is a terrible add no matter how they spin it. They should have gone west to add more Western schools. BE should just start a Western all sports division to go with an all eastern one once all the Catholic schools bail.
We just need to find a landing spot now.
Maybe not Fishy, but he clearly has the power to let us play in the BET. Why not do it? What does he have to lose?
the presidents voted a rule change to deny a school banned from the postseason to participate. aresco's only there to enforce it.
Wait. We have these rules, set in stone, about who can play in the BET but a team can be invited into the conference and no one did any due diligence or quite knows how it happened?
What the **** is wrong with that picture?