I thought it was because she's not a surfer.Hmm. This does not exactly support the notion advanced by folks out west that there is suddenly a big spurt in HS talent out there. No wonder MR has decided to play college ball in the east.
maybe once they got a 4-0 lead, they realized it was insurmountable.What I don't understand is why Mercedes' team didn't come out and pressure the ball and force the other team to play. Even though there's no shot clock, there is a five second count. I understand a spread offense and slowing the game down, but one shot per quarter is insane.
"Springfield's clearly only been coached to play zone defense, and so putting pressure on Willamette to pass the ball wasn't really possible." From the linked article. Wow, could that be possible and as a prior poster (Wbbfan1) said, not good for womens' hoops at all.
it happens in boys basketball tooGames like the above set back Women's HS Basketball.
http://www.s.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IySPC.gif
16-7???
Many States do have a shot clock in High School! I was not aware that Oregon did not,but after the publicity that this game is getting,it would not surprise me if Oregon does consider a shot clock!In the first place it was first team to 8, not 10, winning. In second place the fact that 2 Oregon high school teams played one game says nothing about the state of western basketball or women's basketball except that it might cause Oregon to consider a shot clock. I guess you guys don't remember that the colleges in the fifties and sixties played very low scoring games and led to the shot clock. Not only colleges with lesser talent would hold the ball, but even supremely talented teams such as Dean Smith's North Carolina team would get a short lead and go into the four corner delay game.
In the first place it was first team to 8, not 10, winning. In second place the fact that 2 Oregon high school teams played one game says nothing about the state of western basketball or women's basketball except that it might cause Oregon to consider a shot clock. I guess you guys don't remember that the colleges in the fifties and sixties played very low scoring games and led to the shot clock. Not only colleges with lesser talent would hold the ball, but even supremely talented teams such as Dean Smith's North Carolina team would get a short lead and go into the four corner delay game.
Many States do have a shot clock in High School! I was not aware that Oregon did not,but after the publicity that this game is getting,it would not surprise me if Oregon does consider a shot clock!
This reminded me of times when there was not a shot clock in different levels of play from High School,College,Professional! Professional/NBA realized that a clock would benefit the game by having higher scoring games. In college,I can remember a # of games when Lew Alcindor<Kareem Abdul Jabar> was playing for UCLA during the Wooden dynasty,and a few coaches used the approach of holding onto the ball creating a few rediculous scores similar to the Oregon game Most opponents could not achieve it because of UCLA's pressing defense. These were the kind of scores that existed when basketball was 1st being played.
Huskybill is correct when he mentions North Carolina,Dean Smith and the infamous "4 corner offense". Thank God there is a clock in most high schools,college,International,fiba,the WNBA and NBA. The amt of time does vary between Men and Women,and organizations varying between 24 secs to 35secs. You do see it today to the extent that teams will use the clock to slow down the game,make it into a half court game or"milk the clock" use up as much of the time as they can on a possession!