- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction Score
- 393
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...s-expected-hire-keelon-lawson-assistant-coach
We saw this coming but now it happened.
We saw this coming but now it happened.
The only problem I had with this was how open and forthcoming the dad was about his employment and his sons' recruitment. Pretty much put it out there that "if you hire me, you'll get my kids too".
IMO, yes. I dont know too many teenagers in general, but none want to hang out with parents all the time, even if it meant more pt.Is that weird, though? That the kids would want to play for their dad?
Not at all, just never seen a father openly lobbying for a job using his kids (this could have happened before, but this is my first time seeing this). Pretty much was just saying, hey, if another school hires me, my son will decommit from Memphis and my other sons will follow me too. No problem with kids wanting to play for their dad, though.Is that weird, though? That the kids would want to play for their dad?
Its not weird. I understand why a kid would wan to play for his dad. My issue was the coach was shopping around jobs and talking to Vanderbilt as well. I know this happens a lot but its strange to me how the NCAA basically lets a team hire a parent to get a kid. Does Memphis hire this high school coach if he doesn't have 3 top prospect sons? Thats my only point.Is that weird, though? That the kids would want to play for their dad?
Not at all, just never seen a father openly lobbying for a job. Pretty much was just saying, hey, if another school hires me, my son will decommit from Memphis and my other sons will follow me too. No problem with kids wanting to play for their dad, though.
Maybe not in OP's article, but he was quoted as saying such here: http://www.cbssports.com/collegebas...ng-strongly-considered-for-opening-at-memphisI understand what you're saying, but I don't think this is him threatening to lean on his kids to leave Memphis. I think it's just the reality of the situation. If he's going to be hired at a D1 school, and they can play for him, they're going to.
so this tells me he is being hired by kentucky shortly . . .Maybe not in OP's article, but he was quoted as saying such here: http://www.cbssports.com/collegebas...ng-strongly-considered-for-opening-at-memphis
But Keelon Lawson made it clear last week that if he were to get a job at a college outside of Memphis, then K.J. Lawson would almost certainly decommit and follow him to that school. "With loyalty to Josh, I would ask K.J., 'Would you want to stay [with Memphis] or would you want to go with me and Dedric?'" Keelon Lawson said. "But with us being a close-knit family, you know what the answer would be. He would say, 'Dad, I'm going with you.' So, of course, K.J. would go with me, and then Dedric, and then Chandler."
My title to this thread wasnt to say you guys are actually up to no good. Its obviously completely legal. I just don't like the precedent. This isnt when a head coach is already at a school and his son comes to play for him a la Doug McDermott. This just in my mind is against what the NCAA pretends its againstAnd for the record...Vandy and Mississippi (both desperate coaches) offered Keelon more money...he wanted to coach his sons at Memphis.
Maybe not in OP's article, but he was quoted as saying such here: http://www.cbssports.com/collegebas...ng-strongly-considered-for-opening-at-memphis
But Keelon Lawson made it clear last week that if he were to get a job at a college outside of Memphis, then K.J. Lawson would almost certainly decommit and follow him to that school. "With loyalty to Josh, I would ask K.J., 'Would you want to stay [with Memphis] or would you want to go with me and Dedric?'" Keelon Lawson said. "But with us being a close-knit family, you know what the answer would be. He would say, 'Dad, I'm going with you.' So, of course, K.J. would go with me, and then Dedric, and then Chandler."
That's pretty scummy. Whole situation is weird.
No problem with it happening but these things don't always work out well. A lot depends on the fathers attitude, has to be able to defer to the HC. What happens if the kid doesn't work out (not actually good enough, academics, etc). It's bad enough if it's just a vocal parent. It's worse when said parent has some power.
I dunno. That quote doesn't really say to me "it's totally up to my kids where they'd like to go". It says "hire me or I'll take my flock elsewhere, including one of your top committed recruits"It's scummy to say his kid would want to play for him? I don't understand what everyone's issue is with this.
IMO, yes. I dont know too many teenagers in general, but none want to hang out with parents all the time, even if it meant more pt.
*I like to think I was a good son though too, so if asked I would have definitely played for and helped out my dads career.
Here is what I think the real problem in this is. Memphis can't pay players. So Memphis pays father (perhaps more than father is worth), father gives kids money. So essentially, colleges can pay basketball and football players provided their parents at least appear qualified to coach.