Meet college football scheduling savant Dave Brown, the secret weapon in UConn’s independent future (Putterman) | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Meet college football scheduling savant Dave Brown, the secret weapon in UConn’s independent future (Putterman)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
I suspect if they got a Mulligan, they might not be.

Keep in mind that it was a committee that made the recommendation for which schools to invite. BCU, being one of the three member expansion committee had a disproportionate impact on that recommendation.

Actually...the ACC Expansion Committee in 2011 WAS NOT a three member committee..


"Swofford dubbed the panel "4x4x4," so named because it includes four athletic directors, four presidents and four athletic department faculty representatives. That's 12 members, one from each of the ACC's current schools."

 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,934
Reaction Score
10,096
And there wasn't an FBS yet. But agree with your larger point. If we had made the move sooner, it would have improved the likelihood of our being P5 right now. Oh well.
Same same, yup the 1AA/FCS and 1-A/FBS names alone are less relevant. Despite the 1-AA to 1-A transition factually ending before the ACC’s 1st major realignment, UConn missed the boat on budgeting, stadium, facilities, etc. upgrades several years to a decade or more earlier. Can’t change Perkins arrived too late to inject gridiron and athletics realities in the Land of Steady Habits, and can only move forward now ...
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
1,486
Reaction Score
2,591
Our problem was ACC heavyweights Clemson and FSU neither of which recruits students from the northeast and both of which had reservations about our football program.
You do know that Clemson has signed multiple players for Avon Old Farms, right?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
Actually...the ACC Expansion Committee in 2011 WAS NOT a three member committee..


"Swofford dubbed the panel "4x4x4," so named because it includes four athletic directors, four presidents and four athletic department faculty representatives. That's 12 members, one from each of the ACC's current schools."

This is great. I'd never seen it before. Thanks!
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
398
Reaction Score
1,087
During the 2017 football season I read that Syracuse University paid Middle Tennessee over $1M to play a football game at SU.

Does anyone know approximately how much money UConn is paid to play an away game at a P5 School ?

For example, next season UConn plays away games at Illinois, Indiana, UVA and Ole Miss. Approximately how much money will UCoo be be paid each of those games.

On the flip side, UConn will have a home game against visiting Maine. Any idea approximately what sum UConn will pay Maine ?

Thanks.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,809
Reaction Score
351,405
During the 2017 football season I read that Syracuse University paid Middle Tennessee over $1M to play a football game at SU.

Does anyone know approximately how much money UConn is paid to play an away game at a P5 School ?

For example, next season UConn plays away games at Illinois, Indiana, UVA and Ole Miss. Approximately how much money will UCoo be be paid each of those games.

On the flip side, UConn will have a home game against visiting Maine. Any idea approximately what sum UConn will pay Maine ?

Thanks.

A lot of the info is here: Game contracts reveal details about UConn football scheduling in 2020 and beyond
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,557
Reaction Score
19,546
I have zero desire or need to rehash the realignment arguments of ol'.

The more I read between the lines in this article, I more I find myself able to get on board with UConn being a trailblazer to shake up the conference structure. IMO, the TV money train has left the station and, for at least two - perhaps three - of the five P5 conferences, it's probably a one way ticket out of town.

The NCAA is already facing a mountain of issues that challenge its stranglehold on the purse strings of "amateur" athletics. The next round of realignment has the potential to completely blow up the framework.
 
Last edited:

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,557
Reaction Score
19,546
UConn didn't play D1 when BCU defected to the ACC with Miami.
I don't think this is 100% accurate. UConn was a transitioning program in 2000-2001, and were not supposed to enter the Big East until 2005. They were supposed to be full D1A level Independent for three seasons, but the BC, VT, and The U defection accelerated their Big East admission by one year.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
I don't think this is 100% accurate. UConn was a transitioning program in 2000-2001, and were not supposed to enter the Big East until 2005. They were supposed to be full D1A level Independent for three seasons, but the BC, VT, and The U defection accelerated their Big East admission by one year.
Yep you are correct. We had just transitioned to D 1-A from 1-AA. Also BCU left after Miami and VaTech.

See posts above for the details.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
Here is the full breakdown of payments attached to each 2020 matchup:

vs. UMass - UConn pays $150,000

at Illinois - UConn collects $200,000

vs. Indiana - UConn pays $300,000

at Ole Miss - n/a

vs. Liberty - UConn pays $250,000

at San Jose State - UConn collects $200,000

vs. Army - UConn pays $200,000

at Virginia - UConn collects $400,000

vs. Maine - UConn pays $280,500

So we're in the red about $350k but normally we'd be up by $1.2M. Obviously attendance will give us at least some of the pay game money back.

Still, good job by the AD to put together a solid schedule on short notice. Anyone have any idea when we will know if SNY is going give us a TV deal?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,809
Reaction Score
351,405
Here is the full breakdown of payments attached to each 2020 matchup:

vs. UMass - UConn pays $150,000

at Illinois - UConn collects $200,000

vs. Indiana - UConn pays $300,000

at Ole Miss - n/a

vs. Liberty - UConn pays $250,000

at San Jose State - UConn collects $200,000

vs. Army - UConn pays $200,000

at Virginia - UConn collects $400,000

vs. Maine - UConn pays $280,500

So we're in the red about $350k but normally we'd be up by $1.2M. Obviously attendance will give us at least some of the pay game money back.

>>The games against UMass, Illinois, Indiana, Liberty, San Jose State and Army are all part of home-and-home series. In each case, the home team pays the visiting team the same amount for each matchup, meaning the costs eventually even out. For example, UConn will get back its $250,000 from Liberty when the teams play at Liberty in 2023.

Overall, UConn’s nine announced 2020 games will cost the school $380,500 in total (a figure that could decrease somewhat once the final games are announced).<<
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
>>The games against UMass, Illinois, Indiana, Liberty, San Jose State and Army are all part of home-and-home series. In each case, the home team pays the visiting team the same amount for each matchup, meaning the costs eventually even out. For example, UConn will get back its $250,000 from Liberty when the teams play at Liberty in 2023.

Overall, UConn’s nine announced 2020 games will cost the school $380,500 in total (a figure that could decrease somewhat once the final games are announced).<<
Don't think netting them across fiscal years.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
4,915
Reaction Score
5,364
BCU didn't have enough heft to do anything. Our problem was ACC heavyweights Clemson and FSU neither of which recruits students from the northeast and both of which had reservations about our football program. BCU snuck into the ACC in Miami's butt. The idea that had the muscle to "black ball" UConn is a myth.
Three people were the reasons we are not in the ACC today, Donna Shalalla, Gene DeFilipo, and Paul Dee. Warde Manuel, and Jeff Hathaway also negatively played roles in the way they marketed Uconn. Hathaway was the idiot in residence the first time, and Warde was here when they took Louisville over us. Keep in mind that UConn was not the only school to bring a lawsuit the first go round, Rutgers, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, and Pittsburgh, also filed lawsuits, against the ACC, Miami, and Boston College.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
567
Reaction Score
600
Thank you. Everyone knew BC didn't want us in the ACC, and yet the Tobacco Road core schools were telling us we'd be in. It was only when the football schools demanded a school that would help their SOS to come in that we were screwed.

Okay we've taken care of 2012. Now do 2011.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
If student demographics were the main criteria for getting into the ACC, CT and the Northeast would have helped UConn get into the ACC over Louisville.

You are not correct about the ACC schools recruiting students from the Northeast. If you have high school/college age kids, Southern schools have become more attractive to Northeastern kids. In fact, look at where Clemson undergrads come from:

1. South Carolina: 12,906
2. North Carolina: 1038 (+18 in last 3 years)
3. Georgia: 793 (+97 in last 3 years)
4. New Jersey: 570 (+86)
5. Virginia: 498 (+37)
6. NY: 380 (+130)
7. Maryland: 350 (-82)
8. Florida: 334 (+37)
9. Pennsylvania: 324 (+37)
10. Massachusetts: 309 (+12)
11. Connecticut: 239 (+31)

Here are the ACC undergrads by state of origin:

Miami: #2 NY, #3 NJ, #4 MA, #8 CT, #10 PA
Syracuse: #1 NY, #2 NJ, #3 MA, #4 PA, #6 CT
Florida St.: #5 PA, #6 NJ, #7 NY, #9 CT
Duke: #3 NY, #5 NJ.
Wake Forest: #3 NJ, #4 NY, #6 MA, #7 CT, #7 PA
Miami: #2 NY, #3 NJ, #7 CT, #9 PA
BC: #1 MA, #2 NY, #3 NJ, #4 CT, #6 PA
Virginia Tech: #3 NJ, #4 PA, #6 NY, #7 MA, #8 CT
North Carolina: #3 NY, #7 NJ, #9 PA
NC State: #4 PA, #6 NY, #7 NJ #10 MA
Pitt: #1 PA, #2 NY, #3 NJ, #8 MA
Virginia: #3 NJ, #4 NY, #5 PA, #9 CT
Louisville: #5 PA, #6 NJ, #8 NY

Out of the 14 ACC schools, Connecticut is in the top 10 state of origin of 9 schools (I included Clemson). Massachusetts is in top 10 for 8 schools. New York and New Jersey are in the top 10 of all 14 ACC schools.
Haha Look at Jersey dumping college kids into every school on the list.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,225
Reaction Score
14,039
Actually...the ACC Expansion Committee in 2011 WAS NOT a three member committee..


"Swofford dubbed the panel "4x4x4," so named because it includes four athletic directors, four presidents and four athletic department faculty representatives. That's 12 members, one from each of the ACC's current schools."

These extraordinary people chose Syracuse over UConn? Did any actually visit Syracuse before the vote?
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
These extraordinary people chose Syracuse over UConn? Did any actually visit Syracuse before the vote?


Didn't really need to...but did.

Miami, Boston College, and Syracuse were the original schools that the ACC had been pursuing to form a 12 team league.

Syracuse was supposed to be the first addition as Shalala's bride price to get Miami. The Virginia Governor's blackmail to get VT in the ACC slowed down Cuse's addition.

"We are very appreciative of the invitation from the ACC to join the conference," Shalala said in a statement. "We are disappointed that they have decided not to issue invitations to Boston College and Syracuse. This is a new proposal; we will have to study it before making a decision."
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
"The ACC last month announced plans to try to expand. Miami is the linchpin of the deal, and if the Hurricanes go, Boston College and Syracuse are expected to follow.

ACC representatives have visited all three campuses and a final decision on expansion is expected soon."
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,174
Reaction Score
25,090
Cuse was willing to let Miami and VT go as they were not OG-BE and committed to growing BE FB. BC did the same and then stabbed the conference in the back. If the exodus stopped with the first two, history would have been different.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
649
Reaction Score
1,482
I think there were factors out of our control that hurt us.

BCU's black balling us in the conference that makes the most geographic sense for us cost us. I'm not sure there was a whole lot we could have done about that.
“Not a whole lot we could have done about that”
Thou forgets the role our fearless attorney general, “Sue em all” played in this. Our attorney general, ex military hero, and his lawsuit is believed to have had a major impact in turning the tide against UCONN.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,225
Reaction Score
14,039
These schools learned quick from Penn State joining the Big Ten and saw a flawed model in the Big East. I guess that's all there is to it.

It's funny how they make moves to maximize profit and it isn't the students who see the profit. Besides their living standards going up.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,345
Reaction Score
221,456
“Not a whole lot we could have done about that”
Thou forgets the role our fearless attorney general, “Sue em all” played in this. Our attorney general, ex military hero, and his lawsuit is believed to have had a major impact in turning the tide against UCONN.
Yeah, while I would’ve rather Bloomy hadn’t played this quite so self-aggrandizing, BCU’s AD made it clear that this was “a matter of turf“ and that they want to be the “New England school.“ They were never going to embrace our during the conference.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
567
Reaction Score
600
“Not a whole lot we could have done about that”
Thou forgets the role our fearless attorney general, “Sue em all” played in this. Our attorney general, ex military hero, and his lawsuit is believed to have had a major impact in turning the tide against UCONN.

His role in the lawsuit, and its impact, was diminshed significantly when Pitt was invited.

Nice try, though.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
340
Reaction Score
817
His role in the lawsuit, and its impact, was diminshed significantly when Pitt was invited.

Nice try, though.
You need to check your facts. Pitt did not go to ACC till 2013. by then the idiot state lawyer who po'd the ACC was in the senate. He was the lightening rod that hurt us with the ACC and leaving BE teams
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,962
Reaction Score
18,940
His (Blumenthal’s) role in the lawsuit was diminshed significantly.
I beg to differ. While his actions weren’t the only cause of our rejection, we should never diminish them either. Blumenthal’s taking control of the lawsuit from both a legal strategy standpoint (suing several University presidents individually) and commandeering media cameras and microphones (largely for his own aggrandizement) morphed the BE lawsuit into the “Connecticut lawsuit”. This created a huge negative impression of UConn on the decision makers in the ACC—an extremely visceral one for some—and drained us of whatever goodwill we could draw upon in the final deliberations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
334
Guests online
1,909
Total visitors
2,243

Forum statistics

Threads
159,602
Messages
4,197,413
Members
10,066
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom