Drew said:If Olander can survive arguing with police in PCB (which I saw live and was hilarious)/being kicked out of a resort while drunk for trying to sneak in plus a DUI and both suspensions that followed there is no reason McQuillan shouldn't get a second chance
The spring game was April 11 a week prior to the incident.He played in the spring game so his issue isn't with Diaco or the athletic department.
The spring game was April 11 a week prior to the incident.
NHRJimFuller7:03pm via Twitter for iPhone
UConn coach Bob Diaco said TE Swan McQuillan is no longer a part of program
This sucks!!! Sounds like this was a student conduct call and not Diaco's. I hope he learns a lesson from this and moves on.JohnFSilver 7:46pm via WordPress.com
McQuillan no longer apart of football program
http://snyuconn.com/uconn/football/mcquillan-no-longer-apart-of-football-program/
cttxus said:Really feel bad for the kid. I hope he learns from this and turns it into a defining moment and excels in whatever he chooses to do going forward. Looking back, I can name several such moments in my 20s and wish I'd realized the challenge and opportunity they presented.
Agree he needs to be off the team given what we know about the situation. Noeynox is right on about that. However, up until this incident, this 20-21 year old young man was a respected, potential Husky football captain with great football potential. I don't want to speculate, but something caused him to make a really bad decision in a moment of time and now he's paying for it big time. Let people without similar faults be the first cast stones at him.
Can't answer that question. But it seems justice has been served, no? And if SM was my son he'd have apologized to his roommate and family long ago, which is something you'll never know or read about. My point was that young men make mistakes and hopefully they learn to become better men as a result.I wonder how the victim and his family might respond to your statement.
Can't answer that question. But it seems justice has been served, no? And if SM was my son he'd have apologized to his roommate and family long ago, which is something you'll never know or read about. My point was that young men make mistakes and hopefully they learn to become better men as a result.
Stairmaster said:When you commit a felony, you need more than an apology to get off the hook.
So is Myers the consensus starter at TE now? I remember being intrigued by Bloom's performance as a pass-catcher on a couple of occasions, but it seemed like that was only in a couple of games.
Consequences are apart of learning. You keep slapping someone on the wrist and they don't learn.Can't answer that question. But it seems justice has been served, no? And if SM was my son he'd have apologized to his roommate and family long ago, which is something you'll never know or read about. My point was that young men make mistakes and hopefully they learn to become better men as a result.
The incoming recruit that may be big enough is Lee. Holman probably is 2 years and 30+ lbs. away. May ask Hashemi to try working that spot again.
Consequences are apart of learning. You keep slapping someone on the wrist and they don't learn.
SM would be slapped on the wrist if he was let off the hook. Plus the University used this as an opportunity as a teaching moment; if you fight you'll be kicked out. Giving second/third chances to fighting leads to dangerous situations on a college campus.I don't recall SM getting slapped on the wrist before. I also don't know the specifics of the case, but I would suggest that a school's first job is to teach. Kicking someone out is not teaching anyone anything other than that there are lines, somewhere. I can't defend the kid, because I don't know the facts. But the idea that 2 college kids got in a fight and someone won is not a 21st century development. I would simply like to see the school take an opportuinity like this and use it as a teaching moment. If they did, I'll readily admit I missed the message and/or lesson.
SM would be slapped on the wrist if he was let off the hook. Plus the University used this as an opportunity as a teaching moment; if you fight you'll be kicked out. Giving second/third chances to fighting leads to dangerous situations on a college campus.
so there was no 3rd option - let off the hook or get kicked out?
And to be clear, any UConn students who fight are to be expelled? Or just those on scholly? Or just those on atheletic scholly? Or just those who throw a hard punch? ....
The felony charge probably has something to do with it.so there was no 3rd option - let off the hook or get kicked out?
And to be clear, any UConn students who fight are to be expelled? Or just those on scholly? Or just those on atheletic scholly? Or just those who throw a hard punch? ....
Because being charged isn't the same as being convicted? You remember that pesky trial thing we do here in America, right?How about those who commit felonies? I can't for the life of me see how this is going over people's heads.