Assuming the "new" bowl system reverts back to the old conference alliances, this will not be good for the new BE.
Its like making a selection from a menu. Some go for the beef as an entree, others for chicken, pork, fish, or vegetables. Everyone has their own preferences and appetite.
I don't think the new BE adds much to the menu of college football at this time......and even if it did, don't see it being selected for anything more than an appetizer bowl leading up to major bowls over the New Years weekend.
Right now the new BE would be extremely lucky to be chosen as a participant in any major collge football bowl competition absent the BCS system......despite its flaws.
Which all goes to prove the point that the current BCS system is anti-competitive - forcing the bowl, and the network, to take a BE team that it does not want, and the nation does not want to watch - pursuant to a pre-arranged contract.
Your point is that the BE is not a marquee football conference. It isn't. We in the BE have benefited more than any other conference from the current BCS system. If that system is changed, it will hurt us the most. There is only one solution for Uconn, and that is to play exciting winning football, and to continue to improve the university's academic and research profile. This will take time, but everything you now see coming out of Storrs tells you that the university understands this and is moving rapidly in that direction.
I was a little bothered, however, by the fact that we let Montrell Dobbs get away. This assumes that I know the entire story, which I doubt. But we need to cultivate local interest with local kids to create the all-important rabid fan base. This was a local kid that, if things worked out, could have created a lot of buzz in the Fairfield County region. Small steps . . . .