Massey Ratings | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Massey Ratings

Man, what a great metaphor!
I agree in concept, but it is either a simile or an analogy because he used the word "like." "E.g. crazy like a fox..."

Metaphor: The Huskies are a finely tuned top fuel dragster after doing their burnouts, and easing up to the starting line, ready to accelerate rapidly through the finish line. No worries!

Go Huskies!!!
 
I agree in concept, but it is either a simile or an analogy because he used the word "like." "E.g. crazy like a fox..."

Metaphor: The Huskies are a finely tuned top fuel dragster after doing their burnouts, and easing up to the starting line, ready to accelerate rapidly through the finish line. No worries!

Go Huskies!!!
That thought went through my mind also, but I wasn't going to look a gift horse compliment in the mouth. That's a metaphor, right?
 
I agree in concept, but it is either a simile or an analogy because he used the word "like." "E.g. crazy like a fox..."

Metaphor: The Huskies are a finely tuned top fuel dragster after doing their burnouts, and easing up to the starting line, ready to accelerate rapidly through the finish line. No worries!

Go Huskies!!!
Thanks. I make no claim to use these terms correctly.
 
I agree. The difference between a 1 seed and a 2 seed isn't that important.
Bone Dog, same opponents. The only difference would have been the color of the uniforms they would have worn. We would have been the number 4 one seed and USC would have been the number 1 two seed.
 
Duke is only #7 ?



giphy.gif
I believe this is the same one you used last season, am I correct?😁😄
 
To your point, I remain baffled that, after UConn absolutely dismantled SC in Columbia last season, many of the so-called pundits continued to push either SC or UCLA as the team to beat for the national championship. My eyeballs told me otherwise, to the point where I began to wonder if I needed new glasses…. 🥸
Your point is well taken and understood BUT - one of the charms about sport is its inherent one-off nature.

A terrible team can have an uncharacteristically perfect game and beat a much better team and the opposite is equally true.

At the time UConn hosed the Gamecocks (I was at the game with my entire family, kids and grandkids - what a great time!) I don’t think anyone could really know that the team we saw in Columbia was the team we would see without exception the remainder of the year.

Based on all relevant data to that point in time, it wasn’t crazy to still consider SC and USC as potential champions.

And if I recall correctly, didn’t SC bounce back from that loss in the same way we did after the Tennessee game?
 
Your point is well taken and understood BUT - one of the charms about sport is its inherent one-off nature.

A terrible team can have an uncharacteristically perfect game and beat a much better team and the opposite is equally true.

At the time UConn hosed the Gamecocks (I was at the game with my entire family, kids and grandkids - what a great time!) I don’t think anyone could really know that the team we saw in Columbia was the team we would see without exception the remainder of the year.

Based on all relevant data to that point in time, it wasn’t crazy to still consider SC and USC as potential champions.

And if I recall correctly, didn’t SC bounce back from that loss in the same way we did after the Tennessee game?
Your point is valid. But here’s the thing. Geno has been at this for 30+ years. He is the absolute best at building his team for a championship run in March. A 30-pt win in Columbia in February is not an “inherent one off.” I know that Dawn and some in the media attempted to portray it as such. But that was just not the case.

The common refrain was that “SC was not ready.” The Gamecocks had one of the most talented rosters in WBB, coached by one of the very best coaches in WBB, at home on national tv, before a sellout crowd against the greatest team in the history of WBB, and you’re asking us to believe that they “weren’t ready?” I didn’t buy it then, and from the result of the championship game, I think I got it right.

As for SC bouncing back, they won the games they were supposed to win, mostly in conference. A number were close, particularly with TX. Almost all were physical battles, the type of game SC thrives in. But no one SC faced until the championship game had UConn’s ability to spread the floor, move the ball and knock down outside shots, while playing relentless defense.

We’re not talking about some huge underdog pulling off a once in a lifetime miracle upset on a last second basket. I have watched many years of UConn WBB. After the beat down in Columbia, UConn was clearly the team to beat, and not by a little.
 
Last edited:
Your point is valid. But here’s the thing. Geno has been at this for 30+ years. He is the absolute best at building his team for a championship run in March. A 30-pt win in Columbia in February is not an “inherent one off.” I know that Dawn and some in the media attempted to portray it as such. But that was just not the case.

The common refrain was that “SC was not ready.” The Gamecocks had one of the most talented rosters in WBB, coached by one of the very best coaches in WBB, at home on national tv, before a sellout crowd against the greatest team in the history of WBB, and you’re asking us to believe that they “weren’t ready?” I didn’t buy it then, and from the result of the championship game, I think I got it right.

As for SC bouncing back, they won the games they were supposed to win, mostly in conference. A number were close, particularly with TX. Almost all were physical battles, the type of game SC thrives in. But no one SC faced until the championship game had UConn’s ability to spread the floor, move the ball and knock down outside shots, while playing relentless defense.

We’re not talking about some huge underdog pulling off a once in a lifetime miracle upset on a last second basket. I have watched many years of UConn WBB. After the beat down in Columbia, UConn was clearly the team to beat, and not by a little.

Great points. My comment was largely framed in the aftermath of the win at SC. Certainly as the season progressed it became clearer that UConn had jelled and was absolutely an elite team. But the other teams, IMO, were legitimately considered contenders.

I thought we should have been a one-seed but didn’t get offended by the selection committee’s decision. As someone pointed out, the basic outcome was the uniform color the team had to wear. Other than that, perhaps extra motivation, and the coolness of beating 3 # 1’s.
 
i don’t watch any other WBB games other than UConn’s. My particular pleasure each year is to watch Geno try to work his team-building magic.

I too saw in the Columbia game that he had done it again. As Olddude said, he built a team that could “spread the floor, move the ball and knock down outside shots, while playing relentless defense.”

So i get your point Cabbie about the seeding. It was disappointing to me but understandable. But Geno’s work never got the plaudits it deserved until after the end of the season if then.

If you want to see a short video on this point, YouTube shows how all TV prognosticators missed backing the Giants during the 2007 NFL playoffs.
 

Online statistics

Members online
287
Guests online
2,656
Total visitors
2,943

Forum statistics

Threads
164,440
Messages
4,396,339
Members
10,209
Latest member
gemini*trvl


.
..
Top Bottom