Its my impression - and I could be wrong - that for years, men's and women's bb sold very well with limited marketing.
Let's say in 2000, how much did marketing impact ticket sales?
Now, in football, there was marketing but the big driver in sales was the move to BCS and the BE, right?
I imagine having Michigan on the home schedule this year will sell more season tickets than anything short of a massive, multi million dollar sales/marketing/media blitz.
Getting the BB team eligible for the post season will help sales more than billboards.
A better economy would help too.
So, we have a product that has been sold with a modest marketing budget... and we have had a couple of poor W/L years and a been handed terrible cards in CR.
If we want to have billboards on trains and TV commercials and full-time social media marketing and aggressive PR etc, its going to mean spending more money than they days the CC sold out just because Jim or Geno were rolling out the ball or the Rent was brand new.
So, here is my question - is it worth an extra 20% (which seems like a reasonable amount for a professional marketing program) to pay for all those things?
The issue I have with this thread is the thought that all these things can just be done without any thought to budget or management.
Would you really want HFD as an official representative of UCONN on twitter? How long before Warde and Susan would be doing damage control and maybe having to resign?
"Well, twitter is free and we figured we could just have someone do it without a plan or supervision" isn't going to save them.
Fine - I think that with everything that's been done in the past 2 years with UCONN athletics/marketing - that the money is already there in budget. Billboards have gone up. TV, radio ads have been made and put out. Facebook, twitter, all that stuff, is up and running. It's a matter of putting people in place and in decision making position that know WTF they are doing.
The one thing, in this thread, that you really nailed, is that it's insanity for people at UCONN to be advertising, building marketing plans, etc on the whims of posters on the boneyard. You never responded to me on that. Do you think that people up there have actually done that? Spend money based on reading the boneyard? Call me crazy, but I think they have, and if anyone is in position to make choices about how to spend money and build a marketing plan, is doing it based on the cross section of the population that is represented on this website, they should be fired immediately.
The views on this website are not an adequate sampling of the population that the UCONN athletics department needs to target. The cross section of the population that this website represents is a very small minority, insignificant, as to what they should be targeting.
We are 16 months now, into having an athletic director that at least has the experience of working within, and understanding a division 1A/BCS level athletic department. We are a little longer into having a university president and university governance that is hell bent on aggressive change and improving the university, and raising all kinds of standards.
16 months removed from 8 YEARS of an athletic director who repeatedly demonstrated that he was unqualified for the job of a division 1A/BCS football level athletic department. The events of today, around the release of a website, AAC conference, missing logo's etc. Symptom of a larger problem. When you are incompetent that long at the top, it goes to follow that you will be incompetent down the chain, because the people that really know what they're doing, are going to want to get the hell out as soon as they can. (i.e. Randy Edsall) How long did the UCONN press/sports info people have to prepare for today for the release of the AAC stuff? And you get a guy like McMurphy tweeting it. talk about mickey mouse operation.
there has been a level of incompetence that has been prevalent throughout the athletic department offices for a long time. I think that what Army did, with an advertising campaign, makes a whole hell of a lot of sense - as long as it's part of a larger plan. I think that UCONN has been trying in the past 2 years, more than ever, to do things to change public perception, and exposure, etc.....but I worry that the people that are trying, are not well qualified for what they are doing. How is it possible?
I mentioned this issue before, with tickets emails. There is absolultely no reason that a regular season ticket buyer, that has already purchased tickets for the 2013 season should be getting promotional emails to purchase season tickets (and promotions - means something extra kicked in - for a purchase)
Because the sports teams win, and win a lot. The old saying is that winning fixes a lot of problems. It's not accurate. What winning does, is cover up lots of problems, and those problems get exposed when you are not winning.