March Madness Round 1 Thread | The Boneyard

March Madness Round 1 Thread

Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
4,004
Reaction Score
29,424
Let’s use this to discuss round 1, including the first four

Great start to March Madness. UMBC and Howard was a really fun game

UMBC was dead in the water, down double digits with about 2 minutes left. But Howard missed two front ends of 1 and 1s and 1/2 FTs with a few seconds left. But UMBC missed a 3 at the buzzer, Howard holds on and gets Michigan
 
One thing I never understood. Why are the playin games 2 16s and two 11s. Seems kind of random.
 
They have Vitale and Barkley doing these games? And a hoarse Anderson? Good thing for the mute button.
 
One thing I never understood. Why are the playin games 2 16s and two 11s. Seems kind of random.
It's not. These are the teams considered the weakest auto-bids and the weakest at-larges. The weakest auto-bids will pretty much always be 16s, but the weakest at-larges can be a range of seeds.

It's basically their way of weeding out some of the low end of both categories.
 
.-.
.-.
Caught the Solo Ball TurboTax commercial and the Invesco QQQ commercial featuring Solo, Silas, Alex, and Tarris.
as if any of those guys will be using a diy software package. But hey, money talks and bs takes the bus
 
Is this Vitale/Barkley experiment just for the First Four? Barkley has been doing March Madness for 15 years and seriously asked if a timeout could advance the ball to halfcourt, cmon man.
 
.-.
The play in game should be the last four at large teams. It’s not automatic qualification if you win your conference tournament and then have to go play in Dayton.
This is always the simplest, but wrong, answer.

Howard just got a full NCAA credit for winning that game. Ask their AD if that's a big deal or not.

Can't eliminate the 16/16 play-in without some revenue offset.
 
Looking forward to rooting for Lehigh tonight. My dad lives 20 minutes away from campus and it’s refreshing to see a program that truly prioritizes the student-athlete experience.

Also, how may programs nowadays have a head coach whose last NCAA tournament appearance was with the same team 14 years ago when they had their own March magic, when the CJ McCollum-led Mountain Hawks defeated Duke?
 
This is always the simplest, but wrong, answer.

Howard just got a full NCAA credit for winning that game. Ask their AD if that's a big deal or not.

Can't eliminate the 16/16 play-in without some revenue offset.
This is the struggle that I have with the play in games too. It's great for small, low major conferences to get a $2 million unit payout for a tournament "win" (even though it's paid to the conference and over 6 years I think I saw), but most people don't consider the tournament starting until we get down to the actual 64-team field so I too would like to see all AQ's make the "true" 64-team field and go from there. Save the play-ins for teams that do truly need to play their way in. A conference tournament champion should not have to play its way in.
 
.-.


I’m still bitter about my HS team I coached hitting a game winner with less than a second vs our rival and a perennial state title winner and 1 of our players did that…ran out, came right back, I grabbed him but the ref saw him. It affected nothing but the other coach got in their ear and they gave us a T, and we lost.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,749
Messages
4,537,483
Members
10,413
Latest member
Sec202


Top Bottom