- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 883
- Reaction Score
- 3,740
I think you are selling Samson short on his offensive improvement.There is a massive flaw in metrics if Samson is seen as a well rated offensive player. His single offensive move is a lob dunk, and yeah he does that at a high efficiency. That is something that you can't rely on, is not self created in any way and you cannot build an offensive around. Somehow, someway the metrics must weight that in some form that equals efficiency.
There is not a neutral spectator on the planet that looks at Samson thinking oh wow, look at that high caliber Uconn centers offensive game. We have to be real about the guy. How many times do we see him foul 30 feet from the rim, reach in, not react to a man behind him, fumble a ball, not box out. The thing about Samson is that he exponentiates the flaws on this team as being a soft, one dimensional, finesse team. Tarris counters all that and brings in an entirely new dimension and makes this team a much more complicated to defend.
He is significantly better finishing with both hands around the rim. His free throw shooting has improved significantly. In fact, he barely catches lob dunks anymore because our guards struggle setting him up like Tristen, Cam, and Steph did. He has made a leap offensively, and if we had better distributors on the team he would prob average 4-6 more points a game. Earlier is the year we ran a few nice 2 man pick and rolls with him and AK from the wing, I’d like to go back to that when he is the game.
He struggles rebounding, doesn’t set the best screens, and his defensive strengths (moving his feet, hedging, and shot blocking) would be better appreciated if we communicated better on D and had better/smarter/more instinctual defensive players.
Is Reed the better (more minutes) option for this team and its individual strengths and weakness? Probably, against most match ups. But Samson is a good player who has significantly improved.