Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
March 17 Non-UConn games thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ocoandasoc, post: 2633795, member: 3032"] I'm a Mizzou fan, but -- as Geno says -- you have to adjust to the way the refs are calling the game. Missouri didn't. It was the tightest game I've seen called all year (65 free throws!), and it played right into FGCU's excellent game plan. They spread Missouri out then drove in on a single defender who -- the way this game was called -- fouled them. (In a typical rough and tumble SEC game there might have been 25 fouls called instead of the 56 that these refs whistled. But you have to say that they were consistent for the entire game. FGCU had Missouri well-scouted. That let Cunningham have her 35 points, but held the other Mizzou players in check. They were too athletic for Missouri's bench players who had to play a lot of minutes because of foul trouble for the starters. (Three of Mizzou's starters played less than 18 minutes!) No question that Missouri swooned late (or peaked too early, LOL!) this season. Porter had a bad flu and never got back to full strength. (FGCU let her take all the shots she wanted from beyond the foul line -- she made none of them.) And a few of the three point shooters went cold which resulted in them passing when they should have shot. Often in their last few games the Mizzou offense would pass up two or three decent shots and then wound up taking desperation heaves or very tough shots to beat the shot clock buzzer. I also think that Missouri got a bit too predictable with their offense -- a few more new wrinkles over the last quarter of the season might have helped. Plus, when they missed their goal of getting a $4 seed and playing a couple of games at home for the first time ever fell through, I think it took the edge off. I cringed when I saw that FGCU was Mizzou's first round opponent. I have admired their program for years. They always acquit themselves well in the Tourney and always have to battle a much higher seed. I don't care what conference you're in, you don't win thirty games in a season unless you have a talented and disciplined team. They also improved quite a bit over the course of the season -- their only loss in their last 21 games was by two points, and a lot of their wins were blowouts. Does FGCU have a chance against Stanford? Maybe. I'll be rooting for them. I actually thought that Missouri would match up better against Stanford than they would against FGCU. I guarantee you, though, that Coach Vanderveer and her assistants are watching film tonight. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
March 17 Non-UConn games thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom