No chance of a WNIT bid?NC A&T falls to Stony Brook 59-51 in the CAA semis. My Aggies finish their season at 20-11.
No chance of a WNIT bid?
Stony Brook had a down year last year, by their standards, but really resurged this season.
Stony Brook in 2022 was barred by the America East from participating in the conference tournament and could not compete for the auto bid. They lost in the 1st round of the WNIT to VCU.I think this is Stony Brook's season season in the CAA, I do remember they had a great season a few years ago in the America East. Can't remember if they made the tournament or not. Think they might have gotten a few votes in the BY poll.
Stony Brook in 2022 was barred by the America East from participating in the conference tournament and could not compete for the auto bid. They lost in the 1st round of the WNIT to VCU.
I believe that 2020 was the year they had a long win streak and were getting some votes in the polls. They were set to face Maine in the America East final on March 9, 2020, a game that was never played.
Phew, cuz Charlie C said no way they were in the NCAAT if they lost.Fairfield wins by 8 in OT. Never led until 1:50 left in the fourth. Niagara played incredibly hard. What a great season for Fairfield. Now they have to worry about hanging onto their excellent coach.
The fighting Lous!
Really enjoy hearing Eric Frede doing play by play againPrinceton up 18 early in fourth against Columbia.
But you think the NCAA tournament does prove the accuracy of the polls? Hardly.The Stags are #27 in the coaches poll, so Mr. Creme is going to also have to explain how the coaches aren't paying attention, either.
The reality is that these polls skew a little toward rewarding great seasons vs. mediocre P5 schools... and if you want something that is trying to be ultra analytical - you just look at NET. But... NCAA Tournament usually shows that NET ain't all that accurate, as well.
Yes - the NCAA selection committees have made it clear that NET is pretty much it for seeding and at large bids. Almost seems like we don't need them (the committees), if that's the focus.But you think the NCAA tournament does prove the accuracy of the polls? Hardly.
The coaches are primarily concerned with coaching their teams, not analyzing dozens of resumes. Earning an at-large bid requires having quality wins. Fortunately for Fairfield, they rendered the point moot by winning the AQ bid.
In terms of seeding, hopefully Fairfield will get a 12 seed (and not a 13) so they can get a shot at a 5 seed on a neutral court.
No they have not.Yes - the NCAA selection committees have made it clear that NET is pretty much it for seeding and at large bids.
Coaches follow basketball as close or closer than anyone. Suggesting those voting in the poll don't know what they are voting for is silly.
You seem to have been misinformed.Yes - the NCAA selection committees have made it clear that NET is pretty much it for seeding and at large bids. Almost seems like we don't need them (the committees), if that's the focus.
It has been well documented in CFB and MCBB that the coaches poll is inferior. The coaches dont have time to watch the games, and often pass off the voting to an assistant or an AD.
Look at the voting panel for the WCBB poll. More than half of them are mid or low major coaches. Why is the coach of Presbyterian going to spend their time watching UConn, Stanford, and Ohio St?