- Joined
- Oct 20, 2023
- Messages
- 709
- Reaction Score
- 3,528
Last edited by a moderator:
His meds...in his diaper?
Well said... And, um, who is the host in the back?
Have edibles been proven to prevent strokes?How has this man not had a stroke yet?
Yes, the talented Molly Qerim was on set.
Mad Dog's schtick was enjoyable back in the day. Now it seems a little bit forced, but eh, it's Mad Dog.
Why not pile on.
Yes, the talented Molly Qerim was on set.
Mad Dog's schtick was enjoyable back in the day. Now it seems a little bit forced, but eh, it's Mad Dog.
Why not pile on.
The conference tournaments were always viewed that way - the final chapter of your season. Not necessarily a make or break, but certainly possible. But seeding ? Absolutely. St John's was absolutely a tournament team over half the ACC and MWC.My thing is, like Mad Dog said, do they actually watch the teams? Virginia was getting crushed by 20 pts. per game many times down the stretch of the season, got hammered in the ACC and honestly looked liked they packed it in for the season. Something needs to be done to look at who's hot and who's not. The goal should be a competitive tournament and a team like St. John's who won 6 or 7 down the stretch and gave UConn a fight in the Big East Tournament was much more likely to have given a good game in the NCAA Tournament than a team that looked like they were on life support in Virginia. I think St. John's could've won a couple games. Teams from other conferences struggle with the style of play of Big East teams.
They don't call him the Mad Dog for nothing, but anyone can act unhinged not everyone can make a career, let alone an incredibly lucrative one out of it. Got to respect him.Dog gets paid well for acting unhinged.
Stephen A also. It's all a schtick for ratings.Dog gets paid well for acting unhinged.
Only the bestAssuming you’re referring to UConn grad Molly Qerim

They just wanted to honor the old ACC guard even Pitt was more deserving.College basketball is supposed to sell itself. This dumbarse committee doesn't even watch the games. It's insane they put UVA in the tournament over St. John's.
Unfortunately St. John's was awful in the beginning of the season.My thing is, like Mad Dog said, do they actually watch the teams? Virginia was getting crushed by 20 pts. per game many times down the stretch of the season, got hammered in the ACC and honestly looked liked they packed it in for the season. Something needs to be done to look at who's hot and who's not. The goal should be a competitive tournament and a team like St. John's who won 6 or 7 down the stretch and gave UConn a fight in the Big East Tournament was much more likely to have given a good game in the NCAA Tournament than a team that looked like they were on life support in Virginia. I think St. John's could've won a couple games. Teams from other conferences struggle with the style of play of Big East teams.