Let's be fair with the statement and honest with ourselves.
I give BD credit for calling a spade a spade. Whether the team is "mentally weak" or "physically weak" somehow BD is calling the team deficient as it relates to the competition. The record speaks for itself.
If he is using different terms to call the "cubbard bare", I don't have a problem with that. For many years others have said of the program since its inception "UConn does not have much room for error".
Does that suggest the talent may not be as good as the competition? Do we call that "Cubbard bare?" or "mentally weak" or "physically weak".
Everyone has a ceiling limit.......and maybe when a program is built on "under the radar" athletes, the ceiling is "mentally or physically" not as high as the better competition.
You may have a good core of players, and occasionally each year a core of 1-5 players may get a shot at the NFL ......but you can't build a program that can compete at the highest level successfully with a small core.
I do not have a problem with a coach calling a spade a spade. I do not have a problem with any of our current and former players as I firmly believe all of them wanted to be winners. But be it physical or mental, they may have been deficient when compared to the better teams.
So BD recognizes this, and instead of sweeping it under the rug with excuses such as "didn't execute", his goal is to get players with higher physical abilities, higher mental motivation and drive, and to "fill the cubbard" with more and better core players........which, I hope will elevate this program to a level it has yet to realize.
Thanks for your honesty. Go BD! Go Uconn!