Look at this boxscore | The Boneyard

Look at this boxscore

Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,478
Reaction Score
87,845
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,277
Reaction Score
35,109
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

We hit FTs we probably win.

Shooting from the field was bad enough, but Bouk missed 3 FTs at the end—one a front end—after Maryland had started playing too slow. They gave us a chance and we just missed shots

That's what happens when you haven't been on the big stage.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
1,140
Reaction Score
4,659
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

So when are one of UConn's "shooting" high profile recruits going to actually be able to shoot? Next year right?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,503
Reaction Score
68,980
We hit FTs we probably win.

Shooting from the field was bad enough, but Bouk missed 3 FTs at the end—one a front end—after Maryland had started playing too slow. They gave us a chance and we just missed shots

That's what happens when you haven't been on the big stage.
It's not the stage --- it's the actor.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,404
Reaction Score
36,879
What the box score says:
  • Cole and Martin were atrocious around the rim
  • We were never able to take advantage of Sanogo's size advantage on offense, as I pretty much expected
  • Not enough from Bouknight, especially choked at the line
  • Andre Jackson a complete non-factor despite what everyone expected
  • Nice game for Gaffney
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,085
Reaction Score
6,119
The good news is that we had great effort today—no doubt about that.

Unfortunately this team has lacked the clutch gene all year long. All year we would clench our cheeks when things got tight at end of games. Not sure if the clutch gene can be learned or not. Maybe we can lock the returning players in the gym for the summer with Kemba and Shabazz and see if they can rub off on them.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
2,145
Reaction Score
12,939
Are people just going to let Gaff off the hook for trying to throw the ball off the back of a defender? Totally killed all momentum we had just gained and allowed them to slow the pace and recollect.

This game was so crazy all the way around, clearly and unfortunately deer in headlights type moments for many of the players.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
1,140
Reaction Score
4,659
What the box score says:
  • Cole and Martin were atrocious around the rim
  • We were never able to take advantage of Sanogo's size advantage on offense, as I pretty much expected
  • Not enough from Bouknight, especially choked at the line
  • Andre Jackson a complete non-factor despite what everyone expected
  • Nice game for Gaffney

Bouknight choked in every game that mattered except for the insane 40+ point night.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,616
Reaction Score
25,597
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

Look at our offense in the tail end of season. Tonight was an extension of that.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
5,262
Reaction Score
17,076
Maryland had 50% FT shooters cashing both FTs and Bouk couldn’t hit front ends of 1 and 1s. After Cole got the lane violation it was just too big of a sign that it wasn’t in the cards for us today. Very disappointing performance indeed.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,404
Reaction Score
36,879
Maryland had 50% FT shooters cashing both FTs and Bouk couldn’t hit front ends of 1 and 1s. After Cole got the lane violation it was just too big of a sign that it wasn’t in the cards for us today. Very disappointing performance indeed.
As soon as Whaley fouled their big while hitting a 3 I knew we were in trouble.

That proved that the size mismatch was working only in their favor.
 

Hankster

What do I know.
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
1,926
Reaction Score
3,324
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

But each year gets better. We made the dance. I don't think Bouk fully recovered from the injury time out. When you are the star of the team and miss free throws. something is wrong. In addition, he has been getting picked a lot. When Polley come on the court I am waiting for that barrage of threes. People pick him apart. Have you seen the defense on him? His has been blanketed since that great game he had. Sonogo needed to stay in. Martin has been absent for 4-5 games. Then Cole hitting the floor didn't help. Gaffney is the only player that says "screw it" and tries to get us back in the game. I was looking forward heading to The Battle of Atlantis. Let's see who comes back. It should be interesting.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
3,762
Reaction Score
8,366
We hit FTs we probably win.

Shooting from the field was bad enough, but Bouk missed 3 FTs at the end—one a front end—after Maryland had started playing too slow. They gave us a chance and we just missed shots

That's what happens when you haven't been on the big stage.
That is very true. And keep in mind. By taking this job. Hurley hasn’t been here in 3 years either.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,658
Reaction Score
10,040
We hit FTs we probably win.

Shooting from the field was bad enough, but Bouk missed 3 FTs at the end—one a front end—after Maryland had started playing too slow. They gave us a chance and we just missed shots

That's what happens when you haven't been on the big stage.
We did the same thing against Creighton and St Johns on a smaller stage. I agree with you with everything. Just hard to tell whether it was the big stage.. or just who we are. A poor shooting team. Layups, foul shots, 3's. Regular season or tourneys. We sure didn't discriminate this year when it came to missing. When, where, who, how far, didn't matter.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
343
Reaction Score
853
We did the same thing against Creighton and St Johns on a smaller stage. I agree with you with everything. Just hard to tell whether it was the big stage.. or just who we are. A poor shooting team. Layups, foul shots, 3's. Regular season or tourneys. We sure didn't discriminate this year when it came to missing. When, where, who, how far, didn't matter.
It’s both. This was who we are against good teams. The team simply had not been on a big stage. This is how it played out at MSG in the BET and NCAA. Our team is not young but inexperienced in big games against top teams. Take a look at Maryland’s top wins and it supports this point well. They had wins against a number of good teams in the tournament. These are the games where experience and coaching is more critical. It’s why they lost 3 games to Creighton which is hard to do when you’re a good team. Creighton has experience, clutch players and big wins over the last few years under their belt. This is why that 3rd loss to them was so difficult.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
26
Reaction Score
173
It’s both. This was who we are against good teams. The team simply had not been on a big stage. This is how it played out at MSG in the BET and NCAA. Our team is not young but inexperienced in big games against top teams. Take a look at Maryland’s top wins and it supports this point well. They had wins against a number of good teams in the tournament. These are the games where experience and coaching is more critical. It’s why they lost 3 games to Creighton which is hard to do when you’re a good team. Creighton has experience, clutch players and big wins over the last few years under their belt. This is why that 3rd loss to them was so difficult.
We also got completely outcoached somehow by the most basic read from any idiot competitor. 5-out. We had no counterpunch and Turgeon rocked Hurley without trying in the first half. Almost laughable how simplistic the approach was without any resistance.

Our offense was typical as any big game -
disorganized and ugly. But that’s not new as we normally shrivel in close games. We are good at front running though.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
2,276
Reaction Score
2,943
Without crying. Huskies had 22 more shots from the field. Outrebounded Maryland by 11. 18 on the offensive end. 5-12 from the FT line. 32% from the field, 30% from three. Just a horrendous offensive performance. Yes, Maryland played great defense. But 54 points?

Disappointing performance after a 5 year wait to get back. Head bang

Starting guards were horrid. Total of 38 shots, just 26%
 

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
889
Total visitors
949

Forum statistics

Threads
158,846
Messages
4,170,493
Members
10,043
Latest member
twdaylor104


.
Top Bottom