BigBird
Et In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,849
- Reaction Score
- 10,566
These commentators are corny. Yes, corny.
Yes. And yes.
These commentators are corny. Yes, corny.
What a great friday night.... chinese takeout... cheap wine..... and watching americans beat up on some helpless foreigners
I was thinking the same thing..... kinda like Houston or SMU
We are so spoiled as UConn fans. So much more fun to watch.
This is not exactly ABC's "A" team. They need to let the game "be" without a bunch of announcer schtick.
They are missing a flock of observations, among them that this team hasn't learned to play together yet. Or, that our posts aren't very good at this point. Fortunately, they haven't needed to be. Some players can handle sharp passes, but others make it an automatic turnover.
Seeing the DR's uniforms, it reminds me of UConn v Duke.
Watch the replay on ESPN3 later. I still don't know who the woman was doing the color analysis yesterday but she was terrific. Had a European accent.
That is a Quebec accent and she is a college coach in Canada
"Lost their starting point guard" This was repeated about USA several times. Was Mitchell really going to start over Mo, the Lieberman winner and teammate to the best player, Stewie? I could see playing both, but then Mitchell would be more of a 2...
That was repeated several times by the French-Canadian female analyst... but then the other analyst kept saying that "Courtney Williams is starting for the injured Tiffany Mitchell"... which sounds about right to me.
Mitchell is talented enough to play point for Team USA but I don't think it was intended for her to start at point.. otherwise why would they keep saying "Courtney Williams is in for Mitchell" when we all know Williams is not a point guard. She doesn't play PG at all for SC. I can't remember a game where she played any significant minutes at PG. Mitchell is a 2, a very talented one at that... keeping her and Jefferson on the floor at the same time is a hard matchup.. 2 guards that can manufacture offense out of nothing. Which is why I'm pretty sure Mitchell was the starting 2..
That female analyst is misinformed.
From what I've gathered.. the starting lineup was supposed to be 1. Jefferson 2. Mitchell 3. (????) 4. Stewart 5. Coates
I'm not positive on the starting 3 so I didn't put anything..
Walker-Kimbrough makes the most sense to me. She's a legitimate 3 and that gives you 4 good 3-point shooters on the floor. Though. I would mostly try to go to Stewart inside while Coates screens her man.That was repeated several times by the French-Canadian female analyst... but then the other analyst kept saying that "Courtney Williams is starting for the injured Tiffany Mitchell"... which sounds about right to me.
Mitchell is talented enough to play point for Team USA but I don't think it was intended for her to start at point.. otherwise why would they keep saying "Courtney Williams is in for Mitchell" when we all know Williams is not a point guard. She doesn't play PG at all for SC. I can't remember a game where she played any significant minutes at PG. Mitchell is a 2, a very talented one at that... keeping her and Jefferson on the floor at the same time is a hard matchup.. 2 guards that can manufacture offense out of nothing. Which is why I'm pretty sure Mitchell was the starting 2..
That female analyst is misinformed.
From what I've gathered.. the starting lineup was supposed to be 1. Jefferson 2. Mitchell 3. (????) 4. Stewart 5. Coates
I'm not positive on the starting 3 so I didn't put anything..
she is better at the high screen, because that is the offense she runs a ND. But Coates does a great job sealing lanes around the basket for her teammates to drive in which is what SC likes to do on offense.Based on what I've seen so far, Reimer is the best screener on the team.