- Joined
- Apr 10, 2015
- Messages
- 11,334
- Reaction Score
- 25,045
Nothing wrong with your points, a couple of thoughts -
- transfers out do not threaten Geno's legacy because, after all, they left for reasons that don't reflect negatively on the program. While I don't think that the exact reasons for most players choosing to leave is definitively known, you have probably nailed it. Certainly, there were no overtones of dissatisfaction with the program.
- I thought very much that the dig that started this whole line of commentary was related to Geno taking transfers in, as opposed to transfers out. The remark made no sense, and there is absolutely no shame to be found (that I can see) in accepting transfers. Unless you are out enticing them (of which there are coaches that have been accused), but that is clearly not an issue wth UConn.
I agree accepting Talented Transfers is nothing to be ashamed of--it is acceptable even in the Duke (or the best of) circles. I don't usually throw stones at JPM but her remarks sounded disjointed -- and a bit irrational/emotional. I suppose I'd be emotional if I just lost Ms A.Stevens and others. Even JPM would not imply/infer that Geno or Uconn would dangle a worm or hook to pull in her players--that is slander . Geno's remarks handled the issue squarely and professionally.
On transfers out--this is MY belief, without facts to back it up, that some of those who transferred either saw the hand writing on the wall i.e no playing time for you--or were gently requested to depart for their own playing time good.