This is what Lisa Leslie said:
"I believe Rebecca Lobo was the first collegiate player to join the Olympic team. She wasn’t a game-changer. It was more of a political thing I think and we took her with us. We had great team chemistry and we gelled and learned a lot from each other. It turned out to be great. I think Griner is a different situation. She’s a player who would deserve to be there because of her skills and her ability to change a game.”
What is true is that on that Olympic team, Lobo was not a game-changer. She was not Leslie, Swoopes, or Katrina McClain. But, if I recally correctly, Nikki McCray (who graduated in 1995) was the same age/year as Lobo and also was not a game-changer (and, like Lobo, had just come from the collegiate ranks). While Lobo was not a game-changer on that team (in other words, a player like Griner), neither was McCray, though Leslie did not mention Nikki in this discussion.
Did politics play a role? UConn was coming off an undefeated season and was in the process of beginning what some thought would be a dynasty (which later came true). Perhaps politics played a role; perhaps not. But Lobo was a "stretch 4" (a power forward with range who could shoot the three), which added a new dimension to the team. Leslie did not have the range on her shot that she did later in her career, and McClain was more of an interior player, as was Carla McGhee. Lacey was a center, and Steding was a wing. So Lobo did add a different dimension to that team, even though she was not thought of as a game-changer the way Griner is.
Again, not sure why Leslie felt the need to state the obvious or why she excluded Nikki McCray when discussing Lobo.