What kind of cover defense was Diaco playing, in general? I realize it was a 3-4, with the DL playing a lot of contain. The LBers mixed it up between contain/spy/covering a TE/RB. But coverage-wise it looked like he was switching it around a lot. At times it looked like man-to-man where'd we get beat on unfavorable 1-on-1 matchups. Some times we were playing a zone but the offense would overload an area where two LBers can't cover 3 WRs so one would be open, often in the middle of the field. So I couldn't tell if we were spoze to be in a certain defense and our guys were messed up on coverage, or if it was that way by design and the offense just found the weakness. At times we looked overmatched physically (acceptable, but hopefully a better scheme can help overcome physical weakness), while other times we looked like we had mental lapses (coaches fault or players? I dunno.). What was Diaco trying to do, what was the strategy? If we played them again, this weekend, what would/should have been different on defense from a scheme standpoint? The 2nd half we played a little better defensively, what was the change?