Factoring in the loss of three starters (Sanogo, Jackson, Hawkins) and two rotation players (Alleyne, Calcaterra), we lost basically half of total playing minutes (roughly 60% of starters minutes) and it was posted somewhere that we lost more than 60% of our offense from 22-23 to 23-24.
What we accomplished by repeating was remarkable and the only prior comparisons were two UCLA repeats in their 1967-1973 run; Alcindor, Allen, Warren teams to Wickes, Rowe, Bibby then Wickes, Rowe, Bibby to Walton, Wilks, Meyers. If we do pull off three un a row, not only will we have accomplished something that only UCLA has ever done, we will have done it with teams that were substantially different each year.
I absolutely want the three peat and I would love to be as loaded as possible to make this run. There are a couple things we need to understand with this:
1 - We won't necessarily need to trot out a 7'2" monster or a starting three guard backcourt where all three are between 6'4"-6'6" and can each handle all responsibilities of the one, two and three.
2 - While I would love to once again win it all while being more dominant than we were the year before, we don't need to continually increase our level of dominance in order to win a title. Hell, we can actually win a title by being less dominant in the tournament than the prior two years. We can even win a title without winning every game by double digits. It's been done before.
We won't be able to replicate Clingan. It's impossible. The good news is we can still put together a team capable of winning it all with a different type of player at the five. We can have a different look than the past two years in the backcourt and the forwards and still be capable of making a deep run.
There is more than one way to build a championship team (and we've already proven that a number of times).