I have once asked why have the majority of the Stanford (starred) players fizzle out at the next level. With the exception of the two sisters (who have gotten better and better) almost all the others have not really shined. One day the NCAA will put together a study of players-- coming from state universities vs the so-called elite institutions-- who have entered the draft, but not selected/drafted, and those who have been drafted 3-5 years after finishing their degree. As a staunched supporter of public schools at all level (and I have attended both public and private univ), I would be curious to know if and when these young women turned-in their bb shoes for working shoes those coming from the elite univ do significantly better in the job mkt. Of course I'm not concerned here with the usual percentage who will do well-- since they would equally do well after 4-years at Holly Gluck Univ. Of course I wouldn't ruled-out at there just might be something in the bottled water that players from the private schools are drinking. Of course if we take away these recruiting gimmicks from the private schools they will just replaced them with even more hidden others.