Leaving With Eligibility Remaining | The Boneyard

Leaving With Eligibility Remaining

Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,069
Reaction Score
7,905
The OL in my opinion under-performed this year. It should have been outstanding this year and it wasn't. And now two guys are leaving with eligibility remaining. And there are what, eight guys total with eligibility leaving? Maybe more that we do not yet know about or know that they are considering it?

The old way that teams like UConn used to get good is by recruiting a lot of guys that you hoped were diamonds in the rough and then coach them up over 5 years. That is no longer a viable pathway it appears. If players get any good and they get a degree in four years, they will go someplace with a better program and more visibility for their last year. In this new environment, I guess I no longer see a viable pathway for schools like UConn since the transfer portal is useless for weak programs. Always dealing with marginal FBS players with no opportunity to keep them once they develop proficiency.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,533
Reaction Score
44,586
The OL in my opinion under-performed this year. It should have been outstanding this year and it wasn't. And now two guys are leaving with eligibility remaining. And there are what, eight guys total with eligibility leaving? Maybe more that we do not yet know about or know that they are considering it?

The old way that teams like UConn used to get good is by recruiting a lot of guys that you hoped were diamonds in the rough and then coach them up over 5 years. That is no longer a viable pathway it appears. If players get any good and they get a degree in four years, they will go someplace with a better program and more visibility for their last year. In this new environment, I guess I no longer see a viable pathway for schools like UConn since the transfer portal is useless for weak programs. Always dealing with marginal FBS players with no opportunity to keep them once they develop proficiency.
All these 4th year juniors were recruited by the previous staff. While it sucks that they are leaving as you said they underperformed on OL next year. This just opens up opportunities for others to step up and for the current staff to recruit more players of their choosing.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Messages
1,578
Reaction Score
6,472
Why is it some here are always looking for an angle? It has been said by several sources that some of these kids will meet with staff at end of year and decide whether to stay. So some of them could be back. Even if they leave - this can not have been a fun football experience for these guys. Losing wears on you. Losing at historic levels has to be extremely tough.

If a kid has met all of the academic standards and is ready to graduate and get on with his life, can we not just wish him well and hope that he becomes a contributing member of society, and maybe even a proud alum who gives in ways beyond the field? Can it not be a good story about a kid who gave all he had to a university and wants to go out with his buddies to see what the world has to offer?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,533
Reaction Score
44,586
Why is it some here are always looking for an angle? It has been said by several sources that some of these kids will meet with staff at end of year and decide whether to stay. So some of them could be back. Even if they leave - this can not have been a fun football experience for these guys. Losing wears on you. Losing at historic levels has to be extremely tough.

If a kid has met all of the academic standards and is ready to graduate and get on with his life, can we not just wish him well and hope that he becomes a contributing member of society, and maybe even a proud alum who gives in ways beyond the field? Can it not be a good story about a kid who gave all he had to a university and wants to go out with his buddies to see what the world has to offer?
What's the angle? It's the uconn football board where we discuss uconn football stuff and happenings.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,425
Reaction Score
38,298
Hard to make sweeping indictments just yet... need to see how it all shakes out in the end.

And then you have to look at our peer schools, whatever our transfer / early exit story is- how do we compare to our peers?
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
4,979
Reaction Score
19,494
4th year juniors who are not starting leave all FBS program every year. Out of the 8 RJrs that are leaving, only 3 really played. That said, losing 2 starters on the OL who have a year of eligibility left hurts. Maybe one of them would have started next year, but they would have provided experienced depth.

End of the day, no Diaco recruit has been drafted by the NFL, although Peart will probably be the first. And if you look at how younger players have passed Diaco recruits on the depth chart, it’s pretty clear Diaco left the roster in bad shape for Edsall.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,297
Reaction Score
7,426
The OL in my opinion under-performed this year. It should have been outstanding this year and it wasn't. And now two guys are leaving with eligibility remaining. And there are what, eight guys total with eligibility leaving? Maybe more that we do not yet know about or know that they are considering it?

The old way that teams like UConn used to get good is by recruiting a lot of guys that you hoped were diamonds in the rough and then coach them up over 5 years. That is no longer a viable pathway it appears. If players get any good and they get a degree in four years, they will go someplace with a better program and more visibility for their last year. In this new environment, I guess I no longer see a viable pathway for schools like UConn since the transfer portal is useless for weak programs. Always dealing with marginal FBS players with no opportunity to keep them once they develop proficiency.
Edsall was here for fourteen years his first time. We have gone from Edsall to PP to Diaco to Edsall in a matter of 6-7 years. How can you establish any kind of Identity with that kind of turnover and different talent evalutions? During Edsall's first tour, UConn was likened to B1G teams, tough and disciplined. Thats gone. People that leave or asked to leave are somebody elses guy. Truly the only one I was surprised at was Nino.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,069
Reaction Score
7,905
4th year juniors who are not starting leave all FBS program every year. Out of the 8 RJrs that are leaving, only 3 really played. That said, losing 2 starters on the OL who have a year of eligibility left hurts. Maybe one of them would have started next year, but they would have provided experienced depth.
Agreed, the point is that it makes it more difficult to go from abysmal to competitive.

End of the day, no Diaco recruit has been drafted by the NFL, although Peart will probably be the first. And if you look at how younger players have passed Diaco recruits on the depth chart, it’s pretty clear Diaco left the roster in bad shape for Edsall.
Or that Edsall simply prefers his own players to those of Diaco's for whatever reason including that he feels more of an obligation to develop them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,048
Reaction Score
66,089
4th year juniors who are not starting leave all FBS program every year. Out of the 8 RJrs that are leaving, only 3 really played. That said, losing 2 starters on the OL who have a year of eligibility left hurts. Maybe one of them would have started next year, but they would have provided experienced depth.

Forget 4th year juniors who haven't played. Edsall has set himself up for a mass exodus of his best players by putting them in a situation where they have no hope.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,376
Reaction Score
30,981
4th year juniors who are not starting leave all FBS program every year. Out of the 8 RJrs that are leaving, only 3 really played. That said, losing 2 starters on the OL who have a year of eligibility left hurts. Maybe one of them would have started next year, but they would have provided experienced depth.

End of the day, no Diaco recruit has been drafted by the NFL, although Peart will probably be the first. And if you look at how younger players have passed Diaco recruits on the depth chart, it’s pretty clear Diaco left the roster in bad shape for Edsall.
Losing 3 starting OL will seriously set us back next year.
 

UConnDan97

predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
12,026
Reaction Score
42,337
Losing 3 starting OL will seriously set us back next year.

It's hard to see this any other way.

I hope there's a change of heart from Nino and Cam. Some can argue all they want about them not being tough enough or not performing well enough, or whatever spin they wish to put on it.

But then why are they starters?? Yeah... not good...
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
You can only live on drinking Kool-Aid for so long before the hollow calories take their toll and you crash. Edsall has lost a lot of credibility and kids aren't stupid. Frankly, I hope December 2 is the end of the line. This all starts with his own arrogance and insistence of keeping Crocker around and recruiting to a ridiculous tween scheme and driving out the most talented coaches we've had in a long time (Lashlee and Grimes) to protect his turf. This is on him.
 

HuskyV

Connecticut UConn Husky
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
523
Reaction Score
1,056
This may be part of the new world order. Especially after a player has completed 4 years and is on schedule to graduate - they are effectively a free agent for their 5th year. If player or team choose to go a different direction they easily do so.

I hoop we may benefit with players seeking greener pastures. At least in the near term we may be subject to losing some talented 5th year players who get an invite to a P5 team.(reason to play them when ready rather than red shirt).
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
4,979
Reaction Score
19,494
You can only live on drinking Kool-Aid for so long before the hollow calories take their toll and you crash. Edsall has lost a lot of credibility and kids aren't stupid. Frankly, I hope December 2 is the end of the line. This all starts with his own arrogance and insistence of keeping Crocker around and recruiting to a ridiculous tween scheme and driving out the most talented coaches we've had in a long time (Lashlee and Grimes) to protect his turf. This is on him.
You have no clue.

First, Grimes. Grimes was making $250K at UConn and he is making $425k at Auburn. Plus, he had coached at Auburn and Arkansas St. under Gus Malzahn and he grew up and went to college in Arkansas. He did not leave because Edsall didn't want him. He got a better job at higher pay in a location near where he grew up, went to college, and coached before.

Now Lashlee. EVERYBODY knew that Lashlee was a short timer at UConn. The only reason he came to UConn is that he needed a job after getting pushed out at Auburn and Benedict knew him. He made $600k at Auburn and took a massive pay cut to $350k at UConn to resurrect his career. He left UConn to go to SMU where he is paid more and Dallas is within driving distance of where he and his wife grew up in Arkansas. Plus, he is coaching in the general area where all his football relationships are.

As for Crocker, he had an impressive resume from his 11 years at Villanova and he was from Connecticut. He looked like a good hire. His first year was the warning sign and it was hoped that he could turn it around in year 2, but youth really killed any chance to turn it around. I think he is a good football coach and the 3-3-5 is employed by many schools successfully, especially in pass happy conferences, but for whatever reason Crocker did not work out at UConn.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
431
Reaction Score
2,123
You have no clue.

First, Grimes. Grimes was making $250K at UConn and he is making $425k at Auburn. Plus, he had coached at Auburn and Arkansas St. under Gus Malzahn and he grew up and went to college in Arkansas. He did not leave because Edsall didn't want him. He got a better job at higher pay in a location near where he grew up, went to college, and coached before.

Now Lashlee. EVERYBODY knew that Lashlee was a short timer at UConn. The only reason he came to UConn is that he needed a job after getting pushed out at Auburn and Benedict knew him. He made $600k at Auburn and took a massive pay cut to $350k at UConn to resurrect his career. He left UConn to go to SMU where he is paid more and Dallas is within driving distance of where he and his wife grew up in Arkansas. Plus, he is coaching in the general area where all his football relationships are.

As for Crocker, he had an impressive resume from his 11 years at Villanova and he was from Connecticut. He looked like a good hire. His first year was the warning sign and it was hoped that he could turn it around in year 2, but youth really killed any chance to turn it around. I think he is a good football coach and the 3-3-5 is employed by many schools successfully, especially in pass happy conferences, but for whatever reason Crocker did not work out at UConn.

Whoa, Whoa. Stop interjecting facts and rational thought here. It’s a narrative that fits people’s reality that Randy ran these people out of town so he could keep hiring new people knowing he had no money to work with. He’d rather lose than have talented assistants. Don’t you know that?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,048
Reaction Score
66,089
Randy never hired any assistant that could threaten his job. He may not have run them out but he sure as heck didn't ty to stop them.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,964
Reaction Score
5,840
Forget 4th year juniors who haven't played. Edsall has set himself up for a mass exodus of his best players by putting them in a situation where they have no hope.
I kind of
Losing 3 starting OL will seriously set us back next year.
Luckily there isn't much going back room, can only go from bottom 10 out of 130 to absolute bottom (and we know that UMass will compete for that spot).
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
4,979
Reaction Score
19,494
Randy never hired any assistant that could threaten his job. He may not have run them out but he sure as heck didn't ty to stop them.
This is the problem with UConn fans as they don't understand college football. College football coaches are the ultimate nomads as they look to move up in title and pay.

It is pretty clear that UConn does not pay top dollar to coaches so the best assistants are going to move on. If Diaco had proven to be a winner, he would not be at UConn today as he would have moved on to a higher paying position. Look at how much some recent UConn coaches are making today:

JB Grimes: $425k
Don Brown: $1.5 million
Joe Moorehead: $3.5 million + bonus.
Todd Orlando: $1.8 million
Andy Breiner: $325k
Anthony Poindexter: $600k (including bonus)
Kevin Wolthausen: $225k
Mike Foley: $130K
Bob Diaco: $185k

The only 2 UConn could afford at their current responsibilities are Foley (OL) and Diaco (DC).

The only 2 times that I think Edsall held the coach back was Moorehead and Lashlee. Moorhead got screwed by PP and Lashlee was going to be a one year coach at UConn anyway.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,166
Reaction Score
15,321
Losing 3 starting OL will seriously set us back next year.

Losing 2 or 3 OL starters would be nothing short of a disaster. Something the AD has to take seriously as would any QB here or in the recruiting pipeline. Hope this is not the case but I'm pretty much numb to disappointment at this point. Just seeing too many other mid-major type programs capable of getting it right while we flounder and try to act like we're Stanford.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,376
Reaction Score
30,981
Losing 2 or 3 OL starters would be nothing short of a disaster. Something the AD has to take seriously as would any QB here or in the recruiting pipeline. Hope this is not the case but I'm pretty much numb to disappointment at this point. Just seeing too many other mid-major type programs capable of getting it right while we flounder and try to act like we're Stanford.
2 of 4th years have declined to stay, and Peart is already done. So 3 OL and counting...
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction Score
16,671
You have no clue.

First, Grimes. Grimes was making $250K at UConn and he is making $425k at Auburn. Plus, he had coached at Auburn and Arkansas St. under Gus Malzahn and he grew up and went to college in Arkansas. He did not leave because Edsall didn't want him. He got a better job at higher pay in a location near where he grew up, went to college, and coached before.

Now Lashlee. EVERYBODY knew that Lashlee was a short timer at UConn. The only reason he came to UConn is that he needed a job after getting pushed out at Auburn and Benedict knew him. He made $600k at Auburn and took a massive pay cut to $350k at UConn to resurrect his career. He left UConn to go to SMU where he is paid more and Dallas is within driving distance of where he and his wife grew up in Arkansas. Plus, he is coaching in the general area where all his football relationships are.

As for Crocker, he had an impressive resume from his 11 years at Villanova and he was from Connecticut. He looked like a good hire. His first year was the warning sign and it was hoped that he could turn it around in year 2, but youth really killed any chance to turn it around. I think he is a good football coach and the 3-3-5 is employed by many schools successfully, especially in pass happy conferences, but for whatever reason Crocker did not work out at UConn.
Yes, I have no clue. Take a look at the results. Worst D in college history. Crocker was a horrendously bad experiment. Anybody with an ounce of football knowledge saw it coming. It’s a speed arbitrage scheme for FCS where the biggest difference between an FBS lineman and FCS lineman is speed. That doesn’t fly against against FBS lines, and sending undersized guys does nothing. That’s why we were eaten alive up the middle and shredded in the air. Grimes took a dysfunctional O-line and made then serviceable in one season. Lashlee had an offense moving and scoring until RE put the shackles on because the D was terrible. I’ll stand by my view because the facts on the field tell the story.
 

uconnbill

A Half full kind of guy
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,373
Reaction Score
14,077
The facts are no allowed in the Boneyard doesn't everyone know that, come on folks get with the program.

Hope to see everyone Saturday to honor those leaving the program by graduation
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,681
Reaction Score
15,355
This is the problem with UConn fans as they don't understand college football. College football coaches are the ultimate nomads as they look to move up in title and pay.

It is pretty clear that UConn does not pay top dollar to coaches so the best assistants are going to move on. If Diaco had proven to be a winner, he would not be at UConn today as he would have moved on to a higher paying position. Look at how much some recent UConn coaches are making today:

JB Grimes: $425k
Don Brown: $1.5 million
Joe Moorehead: $3.5 million + bonus.
Todd Orlando: $1.8 million
Andy Breiner: $325k
Anthony Poindexter: $600k (including bonus)
Kevin Wolthausen: $225k
Mike Foley: $130K
Bob Diaco: $185k

The only 2 UConn could afford at their current responsibilities are Foley (OL) and Diaco (DC).

The only 2 times that I think Edsall held the coach back was Moorehead and Lashlee. Moorhead got screwed by PP and Lashlee was going to be a one year coach at UConn anyway.
Must be nice being Diaco right now... He's got $5 Million stashed and living off of his current salary...
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
91
Reaction Score
268
Must be nice being Diaco right now... He's got $5 Million stashed and living off of his current salary...
He was also ridiculously overpaid for his one season at Nebraska. La Tech is doing well this year. He's young enough that I think there's a good chance he ends up as a DC at a P5 program again in the future.
 

Online statistics

Members online
577
Guests online
3,097
Total visitors
3,674

Forum statistics

Threads
156,808
Messages
4,065,199
Members
9,943
Latest member
HassanDawg


Top Bottom