The issue I have with Clingan is he could have games where he scores 20 and is a focal point, and he could have games where the defense sells out to stop him and makes us beat them from the outside and he ends up with like 4 FGA. Thabeet had games like that.Really difficult question. It could be Newton but I'm surprised he's the runaway winner.
You can make a case for any of them, but I said DC. He's our best, least guardable player right now and as long as he stays on the court he's going to put up 15+ every night. All of those guys should be in the 12-15 range.
The issue I have with Clingan is he could have games where he scores 20 and is a focal point, and he could have games where the defense sells out to stop him and makes us beat them from the outside and he ends up with like 4 FGA. Thabeet had games like that.
Sorry to bump an old thread but I think it’s a super interesting “race” going into the gauntlet part of our OOC -
1. Spencer 16.3 PPG
2. Newton 15.6
3. Clingan 15.0
4. Karaban 14.6
5. Castle 14.5
Less than 2 PPG difference between the 5 of them
I think all 5 starters will be within the 12-17 PPG range. No clue who ends up where though aside from Clingan likely being the one who is closer to the 17 PPG mark
I thought for sure he was an 11-12 ppg game. And, that would make sense based upon his fga - basically the same as last year (9.9 fga / 13.2 ppg), but with 3 more ppg (10.1 fga/ 16.3). Granted, competition is about to step up, but I certainly didn’t predict an increase in efficiency on a new team.I was certainly wrong with my Cam take. The averages of most if not all of them will go down a good bit during Big East play. I’m curious to see who comes out on top.